Ganga Dahal, the daughter of former Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal, has issued a formal and stern objection to what she characterizes as a coordinated “media trial” being conducted against her and her family across various social media platforms. In a public statement, she vehemently condemned the dissemination of what she labeled as baseless, misleading, and conspiratorial content, noting that these attacks are being funneled through faceless or unfamiliar accounts on YouTube, Facebook, and TikTok. By rejecting these allegations in their entirety, Dahal has sought to draw a clear line between legitimate political discourse and what she views as a malicious campaign designed to damage her family’s standing in the public eye.
Dahal’s statement frames these digital attacks as an intentional misuse of social media platforms, driven primarily by political prejudice. By weaponizing misinformation, she suggests that the perpetrators aim to tarnish her family’s reputation rather than engage in constructive or factual criticism. Consequently, she has issued an urgent appeal to the Nepalese government and relevant security agencies to take immediate notice of this trend. She argues that the unchecked proliferation of these narratives is not merely a personal grievance but a broader issue of accountability, requiring state intervention to address the rising tide of digital misinformation that is currently disrupting the political landscape.
Beyond requesting administrative oversight, Dahal has explicitly demanded firm legal action against the individuals and entities responsible for spreading these narratives. She argues that the creators of such content play a significant role in fostering public confusion and social discord, necessitating a stricter legal response to deter future defamation. She explicitly stated that her family remains fully prepared to cooperate with any official investigation or independent inquiry deemed necessary by the state. By inviting transparent scrutiny, she attempts to preempt accusations of wrongdoing while positioning her family as targets of a systemic smear campaign rather than participants in actual illicit behavior.
Addressing her personal role within the political sphere, Dahal reflected on the period following the untimely death of her brother, Prakash Dahal. She described her subsequent involvement in party affairs not as a quest for personal empowerment, but as a commitment to the leadership and the vision mandated by the party itself. Emphasizing her selfless dedication, she asserted that she has invested her time, energy, and capabilities into supporting the party without the expectation of personal gain, official position, or public recognition. This defense is clearly aimed at refuting suggestions that her proximity to power is transactional or self-serving.
In a direct appeal to her political base, Dahal has called upon party members and well-wishers to actively counteract what she describes as an organized propaganda effort. She suggests that the ultimate objective of this “organized campaign” is not merely to attack her family individualistically, but to discredit the credibility and efficacy of the party’s leadership as a whole. By framing the defense of her family as a defense of the party’s integrity, she is attempting to solidify support among her base and encourage a more unified front against those who seek to undermine their movement through digital channels.
Concluding her statement, Dahal maintained a firm stance on the necessity of transparency and the resilience of the truth. She poignantly observed that “truth can never be defeated by misinformation,” a sentiment intended to reassure loyalists and caution the broader public against the consumption of sensationalist media narratives. She urged the citizenry to remain critical of what they consume online, asking them not to be misled by rumors or fabricated stories. As the debate over the conduct of political families in Nepal continues to intensify, Dahal’s rebuttal highlights the growing tension between digital freedom and the struggle to maintain reputation in an age of unchecked social media influence.