Close Menu
DISADISA
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
Trending Now

Full Fact Analysis Finds AI Chatbots Disseminating False Information Regarding AI-Generated Images, Conflicts, and Royal Discord

August 28, 2026

Establishing Trust in Business Relationships in an Era of Misinformation

August 28, 2026

Former Kyrgyz Ambassador Emphasizes Urgent Need for Information Resilience

August 28, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
DISADISA
Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
DISADISA
Home»Disinformation»US Ends Information-Sharing Agreements with Europe to Combat Disinformation Campaigns.
Disinformation

US Ends Information-Sharing Agreements with Europe to Combat Disinformation Campaigns.

Press RoomBy Press RoomSeptember 10, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

US Withdraws from Joint Disinformation Fight, Sparking Concerns of Increased Vulnerability

The United States has formally withdrawn from collaborative efforts with European allies to combat disinformation campaigns originating from Russia, China, and Iran. This decision, communicated to European officials last week, marks the termination of a key memorandum of understanding established under the Biden administration in 2024. The agreement served as a framework for a unified transatlantic approach to identifying and countering harmful disinformation designed to destabilize democracies and sow discord. The move has raised concerns about the West’s collective vulnerability to manipulative information campaigns, particularly in light of the increasing sophistication of such operations.

The initiative was spearheaded by the State Department’s Global Engagement Center (GEC), an agency established to counter disinformation from foreign adversaries and terrorist groups. James Rubin, former head of the GEC, criticized the withdrawal as a “unilateral act of disarmament” in the ongoing information war, particularly against Russia and China. He emphasized the escalating threat posed by disinformation in the digital age, amplified further by the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence. Rubin’s concerns underscore the potential for malign actors to exploit these technologies to spread false narratives and manipulate public opinion with greater efficiency and reach.

The decision to abandon the joint effort comes amidst a broader policy shift under the Trump administration. The administration has previously dismantled several government agencies dedicated to safeguarding election integrity and combating foreign interference. This latest move signals a further retreat from international cooperation in addressing the complex challenge of online disinformation. Critics argue this isolationist approach weakens the West’s ability to present a united front against hostile information warfare campaigns.

The GEC, initially established in 2011 to combat online extremist and terrorist propaganda, later expanded its mandate to include tracking and exposing foreign disinformation campaigns. However, Congressional Republicans blocked efforts to extend the agency’s mandate, ultimately leading to its closure in April under the Trump administration. The termination of the memoranda of understanding with European allies represents the final step in dismantling the program. The Trump administration, however, frames the closure as consistent with its pro-free speech stance, arguing that the GEC’s activities constituted censorship and were ineffective.

The US withdrawal raises serious questions about the future of transatlantic cooperation in addressing the escalating threat of disinformation. Russia, in particular, has been accused of interfering in numerous elections, most notably the 2016 US presidential election. The US intelligence community concluded that Russia orchestrated a hacking and disinformation campaign to undermine Hillary Clinton’s candidacy and boost Donald Trump’s chances of victory. Both Putin and Trump have denied these allegations.

Since 2016, Russia’s alleged interference has extended to European elections, often aimed at bolstering the prospects of pro-Russia parties and figures. The US withdrawal from the joint disinformation initiative may embolden such actions, creating a vacuum for malign actors to exploit. The absence of a coordinated transatlantic response risks leaving democratic institutions vulnerable to manipulation and undermines efforts to maintain a stable and informed public discourse. The consequences of this disengagement could be far-reaching, potentially impacting future elections and undermining public trust in democratic processes. As AI-powered disinformation becomes increasingly sophisticated, the need for international cooperation will only become more critical, highlighting the potential risks associated with the US decision to go it alone.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

Read More

Former Kyrgyz Ambassador Emphasizes Urgent Need for Information Resilience

August 28, 2026

Disinformation Accounts Exploit Sydney Swans Fallout

August 28, 2026

Here are several formal options for rewriting the title:

  1. An Analytical Examination of Digital Disinformation: Assessment and Deconstruction

  2. Digital Disinformation: A Critical Analysis and Deconstruction

  3. Assessing and Deconstructing Digital Disinformation: An Analytical Perspective

  4. A Formal Inquiry into the Evaluation and Dissection of Digital Disinformation

  5. Evaluating and Unpacking Digital Disinformation: A Scholarly Viewpoint

August 28, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Our Picks

Establishing Trust in Business Relationships in an Era of Misinformation

August 28, 2026

Former Kyrgyz Ambassador Emphasizes Urgent Need for Information Resilience

August 28, 2026

Researchers Propose Strategies for Countering Vaccine Misinformation.

August 28, 2026

Disinformation Accounts Exploit Sydney Swans Fallout

August 28, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Don't Miss

News

Differentiating Misinformation and Disinformation: A Framework for Evaluating Credibility

By Press RoomAugust 28, 20260

The Digital Fog of War: Understanding the Battlefield of Misinformation and Disinformation in the Modern…

Here are several formal options for rewriting the title:

  1. An Analytical Examination of Digital Disinformation: Assessment and Deconstruction

  2. Digital Disinformation: A Critical Analysis and Deconstruction

  3. Assessing and Deconstructing Digital Disinformation: An Analytical Perspective

  4. A Formal Inquiry into the Evaluation and Dissection of Digital Disinformation

  5. Evaluating and Unpacking Digital Disinformation: A Scholarly Viewpoint

August 28, 2026

The Association of Social Comparison and Maladaptive Emotion Regulation with Poorer Mental Health Among Social Media Users

August 28, 2026

Overcoming Information Overload: Managing Infoglut and Its Association with Anger

August 28, 2026
DISA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact
© 2026 DISA. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.