Close Menu
DISADISA
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
Trending Now

Here is a formal revision of your title:

Social Media, Misinformation, and the Democratic Responsibility of Digital Influencers

August 2, 2026

Here are a few options for a formal rewrite, depending on your focus:

  • The Collapse of HRT Café: The Impact of Misinformation and Intimidation
  • An Analysis of the Closure of HRT Café Due to Misinformation and Intimidation
  • Misinformation and Intimidation as Drivers of the Dissolution of HRT Café

Recommendation: The first option (The Collapse of HRT Café: The Impact of Misinformation and Intimidation) is the most professional and standard choice for an article or report title.

August 2, 2026

Here are a few options for a formal rewrite, depending on your focus:

  • Option 1 (Most direct): “Deconstructing Chinese Diplomatic Readouts: An Analysis of Disinformation in Official Documentation”
  • Option 2 (More academic): “The Strategic Use of Disinformation: An Examination of Beijing’s Official Diplomatic Communications”
  • Option 3 (Concise): “Analyzing Disinformation Patterns within China’s Official Diplomatic Records”

Recommendation: Option 1 strikes the best balance between maintaining your original intent and using a professional, scholarly tone.

August 2, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
DISADISA
Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
DISADISA
Home»Disinformation»Survey Reveals Urgent Need for Collaboration to Combat Misinformation Amidst Strong Public Support for Independent Fact-Checking
Disinformation

Survey Reveals Urgent Need for Collaboration to Combat Misinformation Amidst Strong Public Support for Independent Fact-Checking

Press RoomBy Press RoomJune 17, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Global Communications Professionals Sound Alarm on Rising Disinformation Threat, Call for Unified Action

London, Cannes, Mumbai – June 16, 2025 – A new international survey of communications professionals reveals a growing alarm over the escalating threat of misinformation and disinformation, coupled with a strong call for collaborative action to combat this "information pollution." The survey, conducted by the International Communications Consultancy Organisation (ICCO) under the Media Information and Education Pledge, paints a picture of an industry grappling with the increasing sophistication and pervasiveness of false narratives, and seeking stronger partnerships, enhanced training, and responsible technology deployment to address the challenge. These findings come as the World Economic Forum identifies misinformation and disinformation as the most significant short-term global risks in its 2025 Global Risks Report, underscoring the urgency of the situation.

The ICCO survey, developed in collaboration with key organizations including the Council of Europe, The Trust Project, and the European Association of Communication Directors (EACD), garnered responses from over 130 professionals across more than 20 countries. The respondents, representing a diverse range of expertise from public relations and communications agencies to journalists, fact-checkers, and in-house communications directors, provided valuable insights into the front-line realities of dealing with mis/disinformation. The survey highlights the need for industry leadership, emphasizing the critical role of associations in forging alliances with institutions, fact-checking bodies, and technology platforms. Respondents ranked this collaborative approach as the most effective measure against information pollution, followed closely by training and certification programs for professionals in content verification.

A resounding 81% of survey participants expressed strong opposition to recent decisions by some social media platforms to sever ties with independent fact-checkers, a move widely seen as weakening the integrity of online information. This finding underscores the critical role of independent verification in the fight against disinformation and highlights the growing concern over the power wielded by social media giants. While there is an understanding of the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in combating misinformation, the survey reveals a more tempered view of its current capabilities. Compared to 2024, when 42% of respondents believed AI could play a significant role, only 25% hold that view in 2025, with an additional 22% adopting a "it depends" stance. This shift suggests a growing awareness of the limitations of current AI technologies and the need for further development and refinement.

The impact of mis/disinformation is increasingly felt in the daily work of communications professionals, with 65% reporting an increase in disinformation encounters over the past year. Furthermore, 42% have been directly involved in reputational or crisis communications projects stemming from mis/disinformation targeting their organizations or clients. These statistics underline the tangible consequences of false narratives and the growing burden placed on communications teams to manage and mitigate their impact. The survey also identifies the most vulnerable sectors and topics. Politics, elections, and armed conflicts top the list of topics susceptible to manipulation, followed by climate change. The healthcare and pharmaceutical, food and beverage, and energy sectors emerge as the most frequently targeted industries, with financial services also facing significant challenges.

Massimo Moriconi, ICCO Global VP and Chair of the Mis/Disinformation Working Group, emphasizes the urgent need for collective action: “Our 2025 survey shows an increase in disinformation according to respondents’ daily work experiences along with a moderate confidence in AI’s ability to combat mis/disinformation. In this context, professionals call for stronger alliances among different stakeholders of the information society. Collective collaboration frameworks will be more and more relevant to enable the sharing of best practices, training, and resources to fight disinformation." In response to this growing need, ICCO and its partners released "Tackling Mis/Disinformation – A Global Digital Handbook for Communicators" in May 2025. The handbook provides practical guidance and actionable tools for communications professionals navigating the complex landscape of mis/disinformation.

The Media Information and Education Pledge, under which the survey was conducted, is actively seeking to expand its network. Organizations are invited to align with its ten guiding principles, contribute resources, and join the collaborative effort to improve media literacy and uphold ethical standards in communications. This initiative represents a crucial step towards building a more resilient information ecosystem and empowering individuals and organizations to critically evaluate information and combat the spread of false narratives. The growing concern and call for action highlighted in the ICCO survey underscore the critical importance of this movement. The fight against disinformation requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders, and the Pledge offers a vital platform for collaboration and the sharing of best practices. As the threat of mis/disinformation continues to evolve, the need for unified action becomes increasingly urgent. The future of informed decision-making and trust in public discourse depends on the success of these collective efforts.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

Read More

Here are a few options for a formal rewrite, depending on your focus:

  • Option 1 (Most direct): “Deconstructing Chinese Diplomatic Readouts: An Analysis of Disinformation in Official Documentation”
  • Option 2 (More academic): “The Strategic Use of Disinformation: An Examination of Beijing’s Official Diplomatic Communications”
  • Option 3 (Concise): “Analyzing Disinformation Patterns within China’s Official Diplomatic Records”

Recommendation: Option 1 strikes the best balance between maintaining your original intent and using a professional, scholarly tone.

August 2, 2026

Here are a few options for a formal title, depending on the tone you wish to convey:

Option 1 (Direct and professional):

Google Suspends New Satellite Imagery AI Tool Following Public Criticism

Option 2 (Emphasizing corporate responsibility):

Google Withdraws Satellite AI Tool Amid Concerns Regarding Responsible Use

Option 3 (Concise and objective):

Google Retires Satellite AI Feature in Response to Backlash

Recommendation: Option 1 is the most standard for formal journalism or business reporting.

August 1, 2026

Depending on your specific focus, here are a few ways to rewrite the title in a formal, academic tone:

Most Direct and Professional:

Transnational Repression and Disinformation on Canadian University Campuses

More Analytical/Policy-Oriented:

The Emerging Threat of Transnational Repression and Disinformation within Canadian Higher Education

Concise and Authoritative:

Transnational Repression as a Disinformation Catalyst in Canadian Academic Institutions

Recommendation: The first option (Transnational Repression and Disinformation on Canadian University Campuses) is the most standard and effective for a formal report or white paper.

August 1, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Our Picks

Here are a few options for a formal rewrite, depending on your focus:

  • The Collapse of HRT Café: The Impact of Misinformation and Intimidation
  • An Analysis of the Closure of HRT Café Due to Misinformation and Intimidation
  • Misinformation and Intimidation as Drivers of the Dissolution of HRT Café

Recommendation: The first option (The Collapse of HRT Café: The Impact of Misinformation and Intimidation) is the most professional and standard choice for an article or report title.

August 2, 2026

Here are a few options for a formal rewrite, depending on your focus:

  • Option 1 (Most direct): “Deconstructing Chinese Diplomatic Readouts: An Analysis of Disinformation in Official Documentation”
  • Option 2 (More academic): “The Strategic Use of Disinformation: An Examination of Beijing’s Official Diplomatic Communications”
  • Option 3 (Concise): “Analyzing Disinformation Patterns within China’s Official Diplomatic Records”

Recommendation: Option 1 strikes the best balance between maintaining your original intent and using a professional, scholarly tone.

August 2, 2026

Here are a few ways to rewrite the title, depending on the desired emphasis:

  • Most direct and formal: Addressing Misinformation | Thomson Reuters
  • Action-oriented: Countering the Spread of Misinformation | Thomson Reuters
  • Strategic: Mitigating the Impact of Misinformation | Thomson Reuters
  • Comprehensive: Strategies for Addressing Misinformation | Thomson Reuters

Recommendation: If you want to maintain the punchiness of your original title while sounding more professional, “Addressing Misinformation | Thomson Reuters” is the most standard formal choice.

August 2, 2026

Here are a few options for a formal, academic-style title, depending on your focus:

  • Option 1 (Direct and precise): “Combatting Misinformation through Artificial Intelligence: A Framework Integrating Text Mining and Social Network Analysis”
  • Option 2 (More concise): “Leveraging Text Mining and Social Network Analysis to Mitigate Misinformation via Artificial Intelligence”
  • Option 3 (Emphasis on methodology): “An AI-Driven Approach to Misinformation Detection Using Text Mining and Social Network Analysis”

Recommendation: Option 1 is the most standard and professional choice for an academic paper or formal report.

August 2, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Don't Miss

News

Here is a formal rewrite of the title:

Google Earth Discontinues Artificial Intelligence Image Generation Feature

By Press RoomAugust 1, 20260

Google recently withdrew a controversial new feature for its Google Earth platform just one day…

Here are a few options for a formal title, depending on your specific needs:

Option 1 (Most direct): “Anti-Discrimination Ordinance: An Informational Q&A Session to Address Misconceptions”

Option 2 (More concise): “Clarifying the Anti-Discrimination Ordinance: A Public Q&A Session”

Option 3 (Emphasis on policy clarity): “Addressing Policy Uncertainty: A Formal Q&A Regarding the Anti-Discrimination Ordinance”

Recommendation: “Anti-Discrimination Ordinance: An Informational Q&A Session to Address Misconceptions” is the most balanced choice for a professional/formal setting.

August 1, 2026

Here are a few options, depending on where you want the focus:

  • Option 1 (Most direct): Public Safety Commissioner Sean Tindell Addresses Concerns Regarding Threats and Misinformation
  • Option 2 (Action-oriented): Commissioner Sean Tindell Discusses Public Safety Risks Linked to Misinformation
  • Option 3 (Concise): Commissioner Sean Tindell Warns of Rising Threats and Misinformation

Recommendation: Option 1 is the most standard for formal journalistic or professional reporting.

August 1, 2026

Here is a formal rewrite of the title:

Chevy Equinox EV Owner Proactively Combats Electric Vehicle Misinformation Through Ridesharing Initiatives

August 1, 2026
DISA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact
© 2026 DISA. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.