Close Menu
DISADISA
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
Trending Now

Pentagon Concealed Weapons Programs Under Guise of UFO Investigations, WSJ Reports

June 8, 2025

Kashmir Cyber Police Threaten Legal Action Against Misinformation

June 8, 2025

Ukrainian Ministry of Culture Addresses Misinformation Regarding Volyn Exhumations

June 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
DISADISA
Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
DISADISA
Home»Social Media Impact»School Bans on Phones and Social Media Insufficient to Mitigate Negative Impacts, Study Finds
Social Media Impact

School Bans on Phones and Social Media Insufficient to Mitigate Negative Impacts, Study Finds

Press RoomBy Press RoomFebruary 12, 2025
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

School Smartphone Bans Ineffective in Isolation, Global Study Reveals

A groundbreaking international study has cast doubt on the effectiveness of school-wide smartphone bans as a standalone solution to mitigate the negative impacts of excessive phone and social media use among adolescents. The research, published in The Lancet Regional Health – Europe, involved over 1,200 students from 30 schools across England, representing both institutions with strict phone bans and those with more permissive policies. Surprisingly, the results revealed no significant differences in key well-being indicators between students attending schools with and without bans.

The study meticulously assessed various aspects of student well-being, including mental health, physical activity, sleep patterns, academic performance, and classroom behavior. Contrary to expectations, students from schools with blanket phone bans did not exhibit improved mental well-being, reduced anxiety or depression, increased physical activity, better sleep quality, or enhanced academic outcomes compared to their peers in schools with more lenient phone policies. Furthermore, the level of disruptive classroom behavior remained consistent across both groups.

While the research did observe a modest reduction in phone and social media use during school hours among students subject to bans (approximately 40 minutes and 30 minutes less, respectively), this decrease was deemed insignificant in the context of overall usage patterns. Students across all schools, regardless of phone policies, reported an average daily smartphone usage of four to six hours. This suggests that school bans alone are insufficient to curb the pervasive influence of mobile devices and social media on adolescents’ lives.

Dr. Victoria Goodyear, lead author of the study and Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham, emphasized the importance of considering the broader context of phone use both within and outside of school. "We need to do more than focus on schools alone," she stated. "We must consider phone use across a whole day and the whole week." This highlights the need for a multi-faceted approach that addresses the pervasive nature of technology in young people’s lives.

The study’s findings challenge the widely held assumption that simply restricting access to smartphones within school walls can effectively address the complex interplay between technology use and adolescent well-being. Professor Miranda Pallan, a senior author of the study, stated, "Our study suggests that school policies are not the silver bullet." Instead, she advocates for a more comprehensive strategy that targets overall phone and social media usage to achieve meaningful improvements in adolescent health and well-being.

This landmark research underscores the need for a shift in focus from isolated school policies to broader societal interventions that address the pervasive influence of technology. Collaborative efforts involving families, educators, policymakers, and technology companies are crucial to develop effective strategies that promote healthy technology habits and safeguard the well-being of young people in the digital age. This includes promoting media literacy, fostering open communication about online risks and benefits, and developing strategies for balanced technology use that support rather than hinder adolescent development.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

Read More

Integrating Social Media into SEO Strategies

June 6, 2025

Virginia Restricts Cell Phone Use and Social Media Access in Schools

June 6, 2025

Screen Use and Social Media’s Effects on Child and Adolescent Sleep

June 5, 2025

Our Picks

Kashmir Cyber Police Threaten Legal Action Against Misinformation

June 8, 2025

Ukrainian Ministry of Culture Addresses Misinformation Regarding Volyn Exhumations

June 8, 2025

Bulgaria’s Euro Adoption Bid Faces Hurdles of Disinformation and Public Apprehension

June 8, 2025

Online Misinformation Follows Liverpool Car Ramming Incident

June 8, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Don't Miss

News

CBS Broadcasting of Controversial Professor’s Views on Misinformation Criticized.

By Press RoomJune 8, 20250

The Fight Over Misinformation Funding: A Partisan Battleground The debate surrounding misinformation and its impact…

The Detrimental Impact of Online Misinformation on Cancer Patients

June 8, 2025

A Poetic Inquiry into Information Security: A Retrospective from 1995

June 8, 2025

EU Report: Disinformation Pervasive on X (Formerly Twitter)

June 7, 2025
DISA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact
© 2025 DISA. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.