Close Menu
DISADISA
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
Trending Now

Combating Climate Misinformation with the “Truth Sandwich” Technique

July 4, 2025

Acknowledging a Misinformation Bubble Regarding Transgender Youth Treatments Among Progressives.

July 4, 2025

Researchers Find AI-Generated Videos Spreading Misinformation Regarding the Combs Trial

July 4, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
DISADISA
Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
DISADISA
Home»Fake Information»Proposed PECA Amendments Introduce Three-Year Prison Sentence and Rs2 Million Fine for Dissemination of False Information
Fake Information

Proposed PECA Amendments Introduce Three-Year Prison Sentence and Rs2 Million Fine for Dissemination of False Information

Press RoomBy Press RoomJanuary 23, 2025
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Pakistan Proposes Sweeping Revisions to Cybercrime Laws, Balancing Free Speech with Security Concerns

Islamabad – The Pakistani government has unveiled a significantly revised draft of the Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) Act, 2025, sparking intense debate over the balance between online freedom of expression and the need to combat misinformation and cybercrime. The proposed amendments represent a departure from earlier, more stringent versions, adjusting prison sentences, increasing fines, and introducing new regulatory bodies tasked with overseeing online content.

The most contentious aspect of the draft remains the criminalization of "fake news." While previous iterations proposed harsher penalties, the current version stipulates a maximum three-year prison sentence and a Rs2 million fine for those found guilty of disseminating false information that incites fear, panic, or unrest. This revised penalty, while less severe, still raises concerns about potential misuse and its impact on legitimate criticism and dissent. Critics argue that the vague wording of the provision could be used to stifle free speech and target journalists or activists. Conversely, proponents argue that such legislation is essential to combat the spread of harmful disinformation, particularly in the context of Pakistan’s volatile political and social landscape.

Central to the proposed amendments is the establishment of the Social Media Protection and Regulatory Authority (SMPRA), a powerful body with broad powers to monitor, block, and remove online content deemed detrimental to public safety or state interests. The SMPRA would be composed of government officials, including representatives from the Ministry of Interior, the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA), and the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA), raising further concerns about potential government overreach and censorship. The authority’s ability to issue removal orders within 24 hours of receiving a complaint has also drawn criticism for potentially curtailing due process and hindering the right to appeal.

Moreover, the draft mandates social media platforms to register with the SMPRA and comply with its regulations, including content removal requests. Failure to comply could result in penalties or even a ban on operating within Pakistan. This provision has sparked debate about the feasibility and potential implications of regulating international tech giants. Critics argue that this could lead to a fragmented internet within Pakistan and create challenges for businesses and individuals reliant on these platforms. Proponents, however, maintain that this is a necessary step to hold social media companies accountable for their role in the spread of misinformation and harmful content.

To address grievances related to online content, the draft proposes the formation of a Social Media Complaint Council. This council would serve as a platform for individuals to lodge complaints against alleged violations of the cybercrime law. The establishment of this council is intended to streamline the complaint process and provide a more accessible avenue for redress. However, concerns remain regarding the council’s independence and impartiality, given its potential susceptibility to political influence.

Further bolstering the legal framework, the draft outlines the establishment of specialized Social Media Protection Tribunals, each comprised of a high court judge, a journalist, and a software engineer. These tribunals would be responsible for adjudicating cases related to online content disputes and cybercrime. The inclusion of a journalist and a software engineer on these panels is seen as a positive step towards ensuring a more informed and balanced assessment of cases. The draft also proposes a 90-day timeframe for tribunals to resolve cases, with appeals allowed to the Supreme Court within 60 days, aiming to expedite the judicial process. Finally, the government proposes creating a dedicated investigative agency, the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA), to investigate and prosecute cybercrime offenses under the amended law. This specialized agency is intended to strengthen law enforcement’s capacity to address the growing complexities of online crime.

The proposed amendments to Pakistan’s cybercrime laws represent a significant development in the country’s digital landscape. While the revisions aim to address pressing concerns related to misinformation and online security, they also raise critical questions about the potential impact on fundamental rights, particularly freedom of expression and access to information. The ongoing debate surrounding these amendments underscores the complex challenge of balancing the need for online regulation with the preservation of democratic values in the digital age. The government’s next steps in finalizing and implementing these changes will be closely watched by civil society organizations, legal experts, and international observers alike. The final form of the law will significantly impact the future of online freedom and digital governance in Pakistan.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

Read More

Discerning Fake News: A Correlation with Youth and Education on Social Media.

July 2, 2025

Global Prevalence of Misinformation: Statistical Projections for 2025

July 2, 2025

Final Report of the Commission on Fake News (2018)

July 2, 2025

Our Picks

Acknowledging a Misinformation Bubble Regarding Transgender Youth Treatments Among Progressives.

July 4, 2025

Researchers Find AI-Generated Videos Spreading Misinformation Regarding the Combs Trial

July 4, 2025

Government Dissemination of Misinformation Exacerbates Climate Change Denial and Inaction: A Study

July 4, 2025

Disinformation Trends: Analyzing False Narratives from the Bihar Elections to the Israel-Iran Conflict

July 4, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Don't Miss

Disinformation

Unveiling Disinformation: An Examination of Alleged ISPR Activities Targeting India-Iran Relations

By Press RoomJuly 4, 20250

Pakistan’s Disinformation Campaign Amidst Regional Tensions and High-Level US Visit In the wake of escalating…

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Vaccine Panel Risks Translating Misinformation into Policy in the Twin Cities

July 4, 2025

East Haven Police Investigate Fake Middle School Facebook Page Spreading Misinformation and Hoaxes

July 4, 2025

Public Health Advisory: Addressing Misinformation Regarding Sunscreen Use

July 4, 2025
DISA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact
© 2025 DISA. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.