Surrey Mayor Brenda Locke launched a stern reprimand against her political rivals during a heated council meeting on Monday evening, July 13, 2026. The session, which signaled a sharp escalation in city tensions ahead of the upcoming October 17 civic election, saw the Mayor calling out specific council members for disseminating what she termed “unfounded” allegations. By challenging the integrity of her opposition’s recent rhetoric, Locke signaled that her administration is no longer willing to tolerate what she characterizes as a pattern of political theater that distracts from official city governance.
The Mayor’s primary targets were Councillor Linda Annis, a mayoral candidate representing the Surrey First slate, and Councillor Mandeep Nagra of the Safe Surrey Coalition. Locke expressed deep frustration over the political climate, asserting that several council members have prioritized their personal election campaigns over their legislative duties. She condemned the practice of shifting accountability onto professional city staff to score political points, warning that such behavior undermines the lawful direction set by the council and compromises the reputation of the city’s administrative workforce.
The confrontational atmosphere intensified when Mayor Locke directly challenged Councillor Annis regarding recent media statements. Annis had publicly characterized the City of Surrey’s financial status as being “in a mess.” Locke demanded that Annis provide concrete evidence to support this claim, specifically requesting audits, financial reports, or indicators that would justify such a serious assertion. When pressed to explain whether her comments were based on facts or merely political posturing, Annis deflected, stating that she would submit a written explanation to the city manager in the near future.
To reinforce her stance on professional decorum, Mayor Locke directed City Solicitor Philip Huynh to recite the official Council Code of Conduct and remind members of their signed oaths of office. Huynh provided a detailed overview of the standards expected of elected officials, specifically highlighting prohibitions against bullying, harassment, and the creation of a hostile work environment. He emphasized that the code explicitly forbids any conduct intended to humiliate or intimidate staff, including making disparaging remarks regarding the professional competence of those serving the municipality.
The critique also hit Councillor Mandeep Nagra, specifically focusing on his recent calls for a police investigation into the city’s purchase of 13.1 acres of land near Surrey Lake. Nagra had publicly suggested that the transaction was handled inappropriately and required external scrutiny, asserting that “something is not right.” Mayor Locke dismissed these claims as unfair and damaging, framing the accusations not as legitimate oversight but as a breach of the respectful conduct policies that govern the city’s political leadership.
As the meeting concluded, Mayor Locke issued a final warning regarding the responsibility that comes with political affiliation. She urged council members to consider the implications of the rhetoric coming from their respective teams, rejecting the notion that these disputes could be dismissed as standard political maneuvering. By labeling the recent behavior a “serious breach of code of conduct,” Locke effectively put the council on notice that she intends to enforce stricter accountability measures throughout the final months of the electoral cycle.

