Close Menu
DISADISA
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
Trending Now

Russian Disinformation Campaign Targets Moldova’s Upcoming Elections

September 25, 2025

Combating Misinformation About Judaism: A New Podcast by Two Teenagers

September 25, 2025

CPD: Russia Disseminates Disinformation Regarding Global Conflict Following Alleged Downing of NATO Aircraft

September 25, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
DISADISA
Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
DISADISA
Home»Fake Information»Google Dismantles Chinese-Linked Disinformation Network Masquerading as News Outlets and Wire Services
Fake Information

Google Dismantles Chinese-Linked Disinformation Network Masquerading as News Outlets and Wire Services

Press RoomBy Press RoomFebruary 19, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Google Exposes Pro-China Influence Operation: Hundreds of News Sites Removed from Google News

In a significant revelation, Google’s security team has dismantled a sprawling network of pro-China news websites, removing hundreds of domains from Google News. These sites, operating under the umbrella of an entity dubbed "Glassbridge," were found to be disseminating pro-Beijing narratives in a highly coordinated manner, effectively constituting an elaborate information operation. Google’s Threat Analysis Group (TAG) and Mandiant, its security subsidiary, published a detailed report exposing Glassbridge’s operations, identifying four Chinese companies as the architects of this network. The investigation uncovered a complex web of inauthentic news sites and newswire services, all pushing pro-China content across a global audience. This discovery highlights the evolving tactics of information operations, moving beyond social media platforms to leverage seemingly legitimate news outlets for disseminating propaganda.

Glassbridge’s operations underscore a growing trend of state-sponsored actors utilizing private PR firms to execute information operations. This tactic provides a layer of obfuscation, allowing governments plausible deniability while promoting their agendas through seemingly independent sources. The investigation linked Glassbridge to the Chinese government based on consistent messaging, behavioral patterns, and connections between the involved firms. The targeted dissemination of content across Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and the US, particularly focusing on the Chinese-speaking diaspora, reveals a strategic approach to influencing specific populations. The content itself focused on topics aligned with Beijing’s interests, including territorial claims in the South China Sea and Taiwan, the Falun Gong, the Xinjiang region, the Covid-19 pandemic, and ASEAN. The utilization of PR firms allows governments to distance themselves from these campaigns while maintaining a degree of control over the disseminated narratives.

The four companies identified in the report – Shanghai Haixun Technology, Times Newswire, Durinbridge, and Shenzhen Bowen Media – employed a strategy of bulk-creating domains masquerading as independent news outlets. These sites, often publishing near-identical content, recycled articles from the Chinese state-run media outlet Global Times or fabricated pieces promoting Beijing’s viewpoints. The shared content and coordinated publishing schedule further reinforced the orchestrated nature of the campaign. Google’s action of blocking these sites from its platforms underscores the company’s commitment to combating deceptive behavior and upholding editorial transparency. The scale of this operation, involving hundreds of websites and domains, demonstrates the significant investment made in disseminating pro-China narratives.

Among the identified companies, Shanghai Haixun Technology, also known as Haixun, emerged as the most prolific content producer. Google attributed over 600 policy-violating domains to Haixun, targeting English and Chinese-speaking audiences in numerous countries, including Brazil, India, Japan, Kenya, Korea, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Spain, Russia, Thailand, Qatar, and Vietnam. The company even employed freelance platforms like Fiverr to recruit social media accounts for promoting pro-Beijing content. Beyond the mere volume of content, the investigation revealed Haixun’s use of Times Newswire and other services to inject pro-Beijing narratives into legitimate news outlets. This tactic of leveraging established media channels amplifies the reach and perceived credibility of the propaganda.

The report also connects the Glassbridge operation to a previously identified pro-PRC influence campaign called "Paperwall," known for its network of fake news websites mimicking local news outlets. Both campaigns employed similar tactics, copying content from legitimate sources and interspersing it with pro-PRC narratives, conspiracy theories, and press releases. The reappearance of similar tactics underscores the persistent nature of such campaigns and the need for continuous vigilance. One recurring theme in these campaigns is the dissemination of disinformation, notably targeting Chinese virologist Yan Limeng, who controversially claimed that COVID-19 originated in a Chinese lab. The coordinated attacks on her credibility serve to deflect criticism from the Chinese government’s handling of the pandemic.

The findings detailed in Google’s report contribute to a growing body of research on the phenomenon of "Pink Slime," where the internet is increasingly saturated with fake news websites generating AI-created content or state-sponsored propaganda. The rise of AI tools like ChatGPT has facilitated the mass production of such content, further exacerbating the spread of disinformation. This trend, combined with the decline of local journalism, creates an environment ripe for the proliferation of propaganda. The ease with which fake news can be generated and disseminated highlights the urgent need for robust fact-checking mechanisms and media literacy initiatives. The blurring lines between genuine news and fabricated content pose a significant challenge to the integrity of information online.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

Read More

Minister Advises Responsible Social Media Usage in Nigeria

September 24, 2025

Purchase of Verified Accounts Increases Risk of Online Fraud

September 24, 2025

Automated Avatars Used in Covert Social Media Influence Operations Since 2011

September 24, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Our Picks

Combating Misinformation About Judaism: A New Podcast by Two Teenagers

September 25, 2025

CPD: Russia Disseminates Disinformation Regarding Global Conflict Following Alleged Downing of NATO Aircraft

September 25, 2025

The Impact of Flagged Misinformation on Social Media Engagement

September 25, 2025

Paige Bueckers’ On-Court Impact Drives Historic Social Media Milestone with Dallas Wings

September 25, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Don't Miss

Disinformation

Contested Transitions: The Siege of Electoral Processes

By Press RoomSeptember 25, 20250

Moldova’s Democracy Under Siege: A Deep Dive into the Information War Moldova, a small Eastern…

Navigating Misinformation: Introducing “The Reality Check” Series

September 25, 2025

Telegram Serves as Primary News Source for Half of Ukrainian Population, Survey Reveals

September 25, 2025

Obama Denounces Trump’s Dissemination of Harmful Misinformation Regarding Autism and Tylenol.

September 25, 2025
DISA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact
© 2025 DISA. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.