French Media Under Scrutiny: AI-Powered Study Exposes Pervasive Climate Disinformation
A groundbreaking AI-driven study conducted in France has unveiled a worrying trend of rampant climate misinformation permeating mainstream media channels, extending beyond the confines of social media. The collaborative research, spearheaded by Data For Good and QuotaClimat, and fact-checked by the internationally recognized Science Feedback, examined news and information programming from 19 French television and radio broadcasters, encompassing both public and private entities. Utilizing an innovative AI tool, researchers scanned thousands of news segments for climate-related keywords and statements, subsequently validating the AI’s findings through meticulous manual review by experts. The initial findings, covering the first quarter of 2025, identified 128 instances of verified climate disinformation, averaging approximately 10 cases per week. This preliminary report marks just the beginning of a more comprehensive investigation, with the final results expected in September 2025.
The study revealed a hierarchy of offenders, with Sud Radio, boasting a monthly listenership exceeding 4.5 million, emerging as the most egregious propagator of climate disinformation. Accounting for nearly a third of the total cases, Sud Radio’s continued dissemination of misleading information follows a formal warning issued by French regulator ARCOM in 2024 for climate change denial. The warning stemmed from broadcasts of the program ‘Bercoff dans tous ses états,’ which aired misleading and unchallenged content. Despite official sanctions under the 1986 Leotard Law, the outlet persisted in broadcasting inaccurate climate information. CNews, the second most-watched news channel in France, also exhibited a high volume of false climate narratives, despite a €20,000 fine in 2024 for similar offenses. Even BFM TV, France’s largest news channel, found itself implicated, airing segments containing unchecked misinformation, contravening its own commitment to honest reporting on controversial issues.
The study further implicated LCI for broadcasting misleading claims regarding electric vehicles, while Radio Classique aired an extended segment featuring known climate science denier Christian Gérondeau. Europe 1 and RMC also contributed to the spread of narratives discrediting climate science and solutions. Disturbingly, many of these outlets not only presented false information but also actively disparaged climate scientists, environmental activists, and even journalists diligently covering climate-related topics. This coordinated effort to undermine credible voices further exacerbates the challenge of combating misinformation.
In a more encouraging vein, the study also identified several “watchdog” channels committed to balanced and unbiased reporting. These outlets, including RFI (Radio France Internationale), which covered more climate-related topics than any other channel, exhibited no instances of climate disinformation. RFI was commended for its accurate, science-based reporting. France Inter, France Culture, and Arte also maintained clean records, though their coverage of climate issues was less extensive. These positive examples demonstrate that responsible and accurate climate reporting is achievable within the mainstream media landscape.
Analysis of the disinformation themes revealed a clear focus on key aspects of the green transition. Energy-related misinformation, particularly targeting renewable sources like wind, solar, and nuclear, constituted 50% of the identified cases. These misleading claims often portrayed renewables as unreliable, harmful, or even more polluting than fossil fuels, with some arguments suggesting that France’s nuclear infrastructure negates the need for renewables. Mobility emerged as another prime target, with 47% of cases involving disinformation regarding electric vehicles (EVs). Common narratives falsely asserted that EVs pollute more than conventional vehicles, that battery production outweighs climate benefits, and that EVs are impractical for real-world use, contradicting the scientific consensus on transport electrification. Finally, 13% of cases involved direct attempts to discredit climate science, ranging from denying climate change altogether to rejecting its human-caused nature, often intertwined with political agendas or conspiracy theories.
This study’s significance lies in its provision of comprehensive, data-driven evidence demonstrating that climate disinformation is not merely a social media phenomenon but a systemic issue affecting established media outlets. Mainstream media holds a position of authority in public perception, shaping understanding and trust. Public opinion surveys consistently reveal higher levels of trust in traditional media compared to social media. The Baromètre de la confiance des Français dans les médias, for example, indicated that 69% of French citizens trust TV news, while only 29% trust social media. This disparity underscores the potential impact of misinformation disseminated through established channels. The observed correlation between disinformation spikes and political events, such as elections and policy rollouts, further suggests a strategic deployment of misinformation to sway public sentiment and voting behavior.
The study’s development of a scalable detection model for climate disinformation offers a valuable tool that could be readily adapted and implemented in other countries. The report calls for collective action from media outlets, regulators, and civil society to combat this pervasive issue. Citizens are urged to be vigilant, holding media accountable for misleading content and verifying information before sharing. Diversifying news sources and supporting independent journalism are crucial steps to break free from echo chambers of false information. Media outlets must prioritize accuracy in climate reporting, enhance fact-checking procedures, and move away from sensationalized “infotainment” masquerading as news. Journalists require more robust training in climate science to accurately report on these complex issues. Regulatory bodies, such as ARCOM in France, must strengthen their responses to climate disinformation, enforcing regulations and actively monitoring repeat offenders. Finally, increasing the overall volume and depth of climate coverage across media platforms will help create a more informed and balanced public discourse, mitigating the impact of disinformation.