Paragraph 1: The Shifting Paradigm of Disinformation Research
In an era where information proliferates across digital networks at unprecedented speed, the challenge of disinformation has become a defining issue of our time, compelling experts to move beyond simplistic notions of “misperception” toward a more nuanced understanding of its roots. A new session dedicated to exploring the human and social foundations of disinformation contends that the spread of false information cannot be adequately understood or combated by merely focusing on individual cognitive errors. Rather, the session posits that disinformation is a fundamentally social and relational process, shaped by the intricate interplay of group dynamics, identity-based reasoning, and the increasingly networked environments in which we communicate and consume news. This comprehensive approach moves the discussion from pathology of the individual mind to the functionality of the social system, acknowledging that the driving forces behind belief formation and information sharing are deeply embedded in how we relate to one another and the world around us. The session is proactively designed for media literacy practitioners, fact-checkers, journalists, social psychologists, and researchers in communication and AI ethics, all of whom are united by a common goal of grasping the behavioral and communal mechanisms that facilitate the virality of misinformation. By framing the issue in broader social and psychological terms, the session seeks to equip participants with a nuanced lens for understanding of not just what disinformation is, but rather why it takes hold and how it becomes a tool for social cohesion and identity affirmation.
Paragraph 2: The Psychological Underpinnings of Belief… and Sharing
The session provides a comprehensive breakdown of how narratives propagate through social networks, emphasizing that interpretation is not a uniform phenomenon but one that is heavily mediated by the specific environment and identity of the recipients. By exploring cognitive biases and psychological mechanisms that shape perception and belief formation, participants move beyond the simplistic notion that misinformation suggests stupidity or a lack of logic. Instead, the focus shifts to analyzing how motivations, cognitive shortcuts, and identity-based reasoning influence a person’s passive reception of information. Participants will foreground the selecting of emotional elements to probe how people latch onto narratives that reinforce pre-existing worldviews, going so far as to interpret information in a way that protects their sense of self and belonging. It suggests that while people navigate through massive interactions, they are often driven by emotion and social cues that resonate with their existing cognitive models, making them susceptible to narratives even when they contradict factual evidence. This discussion aims to detail how individuals process and share information based on cognitive convenience, not just embracing what feels right, but in many cases, whether they feel part of a narrative and how the information is presented in the larger information ecosystem.
Paragraph 3: The Role of Identity-Protective Cognition and Group Dynamics
A significant part of the session focuses on how social identity plays an important role in the transmission and acceptance of disinformation; identity-based reasoning and group dynamics are important drivers, especially when communities are polarized. The session will analyze how exchanges of fact-checking related to information can promote polarization, as individuals tend to seek value that preserves their group’s status or protects their sense of identity. This perspective suggests that the assertion of any given narrative is not just about the truthfulness of the subject but about an individual’s connection and loyalty to the social groups they belong to. The session explains that strongly connecting individuals to their social identities paves the way for them to engage in selective exposure, concluding that they will go to lengths to stick to their in-group and information they perceive as a confirmation from a source. By placing the narrative the center of social groups, the session shows how disinformation is woven into structures of communities and is hardly simple fake news, it’s a relational resource. This nuanced view of how group dynamics shape perception highlights the obstacles behind simply compelling critical thinking and the necessity of making means to address the deep social drivers when mapping onto strategies to foster understanding among different groups with different belief systems and perspectives.
Paragraph 4: The Emerging Interface of AI and Mediated Cognition
A central feature of the session is the exploration of the emerging role of AI companions and conversational systems in shaping perception, emotional engagement, and information trust, generating new questions about influence, dependency, and mediated cognition. Because AI systems are exerting increasing control into the creative and communication fields, they are becoming part of communication infrastructure that mediates relationships, and can shape entire emotional environments. In the context of disinformation, integrating AI companions into the session demonstrates how these technologies can influence the dynamics of trust. They can be used as conversational networks and tailored data to create relationships with users and feed them with narratives that feel personal and earnest, effectively building a gate through which individuals view the world; this alters the boundaries between creation and consumption. And there are implications not only when it comes to working independently, but also larger sociopolitical issues, including how human cohorts are able to maintain the sway in the face of AI that is actively shaping their perception. Through exploring these emerging digital contexts, the session examines how the growth of AI is becoming a crucial source of connection that alters human interaction with information spaces and the social relations that emerge between users, developers, and the platform itself.
Paragraph 5: Translating Theory into Practice and Intervention
The session focuses on moving beyond the theories with a crucial goal to connect psychological and social theory to practical interventions in media literacy, journalism, and civic engagement. Through empirical research and applied case studies, the session analyzes and offers concrete strategies for educators, fact-checkers, journalists, and community leaders. This involves framing of critical thinking with oversight strategies that go beyond a passive correction of misinformation to tackle the structural and social biases that govern an audience’s interpretation. By understanding the social and emotional motivations that influence people’s openness to correction, participants can design educational interventions and produce journalistic content that gets more deeply woven into the fabric of communities and respects their identities rather than challenging them. The success resides in translating these human insights into practical methods for teaching, media literacy, verification practice, and community-level resilience. Knowing how and why the audience gets to a piece of information allows practitioners not just to present facts, but to build a solid foundation filled with emotional and community-based reasoning. After all, operations of fact-checking and diverse reporting are at risk of being rejected if they are not expressed in a way that corresponds with the target group’s psychological and social ways of knowing.
Paragraph 6: Building Resilience and the Future of Information Exchange
The session concludes by reiterating that public resilience to disinformation in modern society depends on a much broader approach than just deleting bad content; it is about creating the underlying social conditions that foster a discerning and engaged public. When the participants are hand in hand with the new challenges that come with the use of data, they explore the implications of moving polarisation and “disinformation” into a way that requires collectively creating the capacity for dialogue and self-determination. Course participants come away speaking the language of behavioral and social insights to explain media narratives, not just how to debunk false claims, but how to foster healthier public conversations and strengthen communities against further manipulation. And importantly, the group is designed to incorporate practical ways to strengthen critical thinking as a communal practice, not just individual skill. By nurturing an understanding of social identity and AI-led influence, the collective goal is to forge new paths toward a model of media production, education, and engagement that is resilient to the challenges of the digital age. In doing so, the session plays a vital role in setting optimistic, practical, and perhaps more Stuart the way forward for a world where AI dominates the relations between humans and information in a new age.
Register here >]