Close Menu
DISADISA
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
Trending Now

CnaM Funds Anti-Misinformation Resources for Eight-Year-Olds

August 27, 2026

Addressing Client Challenges

August 27, 2026

Russian Disinformation Operations Test Electoral Tactics for Ukraine

August 27, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
DISADISA
Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
DISADISA
Home»Disinformation»Critical Omission in State Disinformation Mitigation Plan
Disinformation

Critical Omission in State Disinformation Mitigation Plan

Press RoomBy Press RoomApril 17, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Dublin, April 17, 2025 – The Irish government’s newly unveiled National Counter Disinformation Strategy has drawn sharp criticism from the Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) for its perceived failure to address the algorithmic amplification of disinformation on social media platforms. The ICCL, a former member of the working group that spent two years developing the strategy, withdrew its participation in August 2024 due to the government’s reluctance to implement concrete measures targeting these algorithms. The organization argues that the strategy, published today, falls short of the necessary actions to safeguard democracy against the manipulative power of these technological tools.

At the heart of the ICCL’s critique lies the pervasive influence of "recommender" algorithms employed by platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram. These algorithms personalize user feeds by tracking individual behaviors and preferences, creating echo chambers that prioritize engagement over factual accuracy. This personalized content delivery system, according to the ICCL, has become the primary source of political information for Europeans under 30, raising concerns about the potential for manipulation and the erosion of informed public discourse.

The ICCL contends that these algorithms, controlled by foreign tech giants, wield undue influence over public debate. Dr. Johnny Ryan, of the ICCL, argues that these "hidden levers" are being exploited to suppress credible journalism, amplify certain voices, and silence others. He warns that the algorithms, primarily designed to maximize revenue, have inadvertently fueled extremism and exposed vulnerable users, including children, to harmful content like self-harm and suicide-related material. With the rise of figures like Donald Trump, Dr. Ryan posits a more deliberate and malicious use of these algorithms to bolster authoritarianism across the continent.

The ICCL’s concerns escalate beyond accidental manipulation to encompass a more insidious threat: the potential for intentional manipulation of public opinion through these powerful algorithms. Dr. Ryan highlights the vulnerability of democratic processes to foreign interference through these platforms. He criticizes the government’s strategy as a continuation of inadequate measures, emphasizing the urgency for a bold and decisive response to this escalating threat. He calls for a paradigm shift in how we address the algorithmic control of information, demanding concrete action to mitigate the risks posed by these technologies.

Beyond criticizing the government’s strategy, the ICCL has taken its concerns to the European level. This week, the organization publicly urged European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to pressure Ireland into disabling US and Chinese-owned recommender algorithms across Europe. The ICCL underscores the need for European-wide action to reclaim control over the information landscape and protect democratic processes from algorithmic manipulation.

This call for action resonates with public sentiment in Ireland. Citing a January 2024 poll by Ireland Thinks, the ICCL notes that 82% of the Irish public supports disabling these "toxic" algorithms. Dr. Ryan emphasizes that individuals, not algorithms, should have the autonomy to choose what they consume online. This overwhelming public support, according to the ICCL, underscores the urgency and necessity of addressing the issue of algorithmic manipulation and empowering individuals to regain control over their online experience. The ICCL’s stance highlights the growing tension between technological advancement and democratic values, prompting a crucial debate on the future of online information and its impact on society.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

Read More

Addressing Client Challenges

August 27, 2026

Russian Disinformation Operations Test Electoral Tactics for Ukraine

August 27, 2026

Russian Disinformation Tests Its Electoral Interference Strategy for Ukraine

August 27, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Our Picks

Addressing Client Challenges

August 27, 2026

Russian Disinformation Operations Test Electoral Tactics for Ukraine

August 27, 2026

Mistrust and Ebola: How Conflict, Displacement, and Resource Extraction Facilitate the Proliferation of Misinformation

August 27, 2026

Russian Disinformation Tests Its Electoral Interference Strategy for Ukraine

August 27, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Don't Miss

News

Vietnam Bolsters Defenses Against AI-Driven Misinformation

By Press RoomAugust 27, 20260

Vietnam’s Digital Shield: Confronting the Deepfake Era Vietnam is moving to harden its online information…

Anwar Gargash Urges Accurate and Fair Media to Safeguard Truth Against Misinformation

August 27, 2026

Australia’s Crackdown Culminates in Global Social Media Bans and a Reckoning for Technology Giants.

August 27, 2026

Czechs and Poles Unite Against Suspected Russian Disinformation Campaign

August 27, 2026
DISA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact
© 2026 DISA. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.