Close Menu
DISADISA
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
Trending Now

Mitigating Online Disinformation and AI Threats: Guidance for Electoral Candidates and Officials

July 1, 2025

Government Project Selects Originator Profile Development to Combat AI-Generated Misinformation

July 1, 2025

The Impact of AI-Driven Disinformation on the Upcoming Election

July 1, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
DISADISA
Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
DISADISA
Home»Social Media»Turkey Implements Restrictions on 27,304 Social Media Accounts During the First Quadrimester of 2025.
Social Media

Turkey Implements Restrictions on 27,304 Social Media Accounts During the First Quadrimester of 2025.

Press RoomBy Press RoomMay 9, 2025
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Turkey’s Digital Crackdown Intensifies Amidst Concerns Over Disinformation and National Security

Turkey’s Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya announced a significant escalation in the government’s digital crackdown, revealing that over 27,300 social media accounts and nearly 7,000 URLs were blocked in the first four months of 2025 alone. This disclosure came during a government-sponsored workshop on "synthetic media and disinformation," where Yerlikaya defended the measures as crucial for safeguarding national security and public order. The Minister cited a surge in online disinformation and the proliferation of deepfake technology as justification for the government’s actions, emphasizing the potential of these technologies to undermine public trust and incite unrest. This latest wave of censorship follows a broader trend of increasing digital control under Yerlikaya’s tenure, with over 237,000 accounts flagged as containing "criminal content" and subsequently blocked since he assumed office in June 2023.

The government’s intensified focus on online content has sparked alarm among human rights organizations and digital freedom advocates, who argue that the vaguely defined national security laws and expedited court orders are being weaponized to silence dissent and suppress critical voices. While Yerlikaya framed the digital enforcement as a public safety measure, critics contend that the government’s actions are disproportionately targeting journalists, activists, and opposition figures. The lack of transparency surrounding the criteria used to identify "criminal content" and the protracted appeals process further raise concerns about the arbitrary nature of these bans. This latest announcement adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting a concerted effort to control the online narrative and restrict freedom of expression in Turkey.

Yerlikaya underscored the government’s commitment to combating online threats by highlighting the round-the-clock operations of cybercrime units within the national police and gendarmerie. He asserted that public complaints regarding harmful online content are addressed promptly, and content deemed to incite unrest or spread disinformation is swiftly removed. The Minister also accused global social media platforms of exhibiting a bias against content related to conflicts in Muslim-majority regions, citing the alleged censorship of pro-Palestinian voices during Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. Yerlikaya likened this alleged suppression to the "algorithmic imprisonment" of Palestinian narratives, echoing criticisms from international human rights groups concerning the disproportionate flagging and removal of pro-Palestinian content.

The Interior Minister’s remarks reflect a broader concern within the Turkish government regarding the perceived influence of "hegemonic actors" in the technology sector. He warned that synthetic media and other emerging digital threats, including online scams, illegal gambling, child exploitation, and cyberbullying, pose transnational challenges requiring urgent government intervention. Yerlikaya pledged to address these cybercrimes with the same resolve demonstrated in the government’s counterterrorism and anti-drug efforts. This statement reinforces the government’s framing of online censorship as an integral component of its broader security agenda, a narrative that has been consistently challenged by critics who view these measures as a pretext for suppressing dissent.

However, the underlying concern voiced by critics revolves around the broad interpretation of Turkey’s Law No. 5651, which they argue enables the government to arbitrarily block content critical of its policies. Recent months have witnessed a surge in court-ordered account suspensions targeting opposition-affiliated individuals and organizations, including exiled journalists, independent news outlets, and even the official account of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, a prominent political rival of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. The timing of these actions, particularly following İmamoğlu’s arrest in March, has fueled suspicions that the government is increasingly leveraging digital censorship to stifle political opposition and control the flow of information.

International press freedom organizations and digital rights groups, such as the Freedom of Expression Association (İFÖD) and EngelliWeb, have documented a sharp increase in government takedown orders, highlighting the escalating crackdown on online dissent. The lack of transparency surrounding the criteria used to justify these bans and the limited avenues for appeal raise serious concerns about due process and the potential for abuse. Furthermore, the impact of these blocks often extends beyond Turkey’s borders, with affected accounts experiencing reduced global visibility due to platform-level downgrading, effectively silencing their voices on a wider scale. The Turkish government’s increasing reliance on digital censorship has contributed to its declining ranking in global media freedom indices, underscoring the erosion of online freedoms in the country. As Turkey continues to grapple with the challenges of disinformation and online security, the delicate balance between protecting public order and safeguarding fundamental rights remains a contentious issue.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

Read More

Mitigating Online Disinformation and AI Threats: Guidance for Electoral Candidates and Officials

July 1, 2025

The Impact of Social Media, Disinformation, and AI on the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election

June 29, 2025

Limerick College Launches Forum on Misinformation

June 29, 2025

Our Picks

Government Project Selects Originator Profile Development to Combat AI-Generated Misinformation

July 1, 2025

The Impact of AI-Driven Disinformation on the Upcoming Election

July 1, 2025

Proposed Danish Legislation Criminalizes Dissemination of Deepfake Images to Combat Misinformation

July 1, 2025

Brazilian Ambassador Condemns Disinformation Campaign Targeting Mercosur Agreement

July 1, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Don't Miss

Disinformation

Information Overload: Safeguarding Cognition and Democratic Processes

By Press RoomJuly 1, 20250

The Crumbling Foundation of Shared Reality: How Misinformation and Algorithmic Chaos Threaten Democracy The digital…

DC Police and Advocates Address Social Media Misinformation Regarding Missing Persons

July 1, 2025

Chesapeake Bay Foundation Perpetuates Inaccurate Claims Regarding Menhaden.

June 30, 2025

Ukraine Forewarns of Potential Russian Disinformation Campaign in Advance of BRICS Summit

June 30, 2025
DISA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact
© 2025 DISA. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.