Close Menu
DISADISA
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
Trending Now

Gadkari Denies Reports of Two-Wheeler Tolls, Condemns Misinformation

June 26, 2025

EU Commission Cites Big Tech’s Insufficiency in Combating Disinformation

June 26, 2025

Big Tech’s Insufficient Efforts to Combat Disinformation

June 26, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
DISADISA
Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
DISADISA
Home»News»The Legal Parameters of Expression and Silence
News

The Legal Parameters of Expression and Silence

Press RoomBy Press RoomJune 26, 2025
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

The insidious appropriation of feminist ideals in India’s socio-political landscape

India’s socio-political landscape is witnessing a concerning trend: the appropriation of progressive concepts like feminism and "decolonization" by right-wing ideologies, twisting their meaning to serve regressive agendas. Much like the term "decolonization" has been hijacked to promote discriminatory worldviews, feminism is being molded into a tool to uphold traditional, patriarchal structures. This manipulation occurs through various tactics, most notably through symbolic representation. Women who conform to specific socio-cultural ideals, often characterized by a strong nationalist sentiment, are presented as paragons of feminist virtues. This selective valorization creates a narrow, exclusionary definition of feminism that serves to silence dissenting voices.

The danger lies in the imminent labeling of those who challenge this distorted version of feminism as "anti-feminist." This tactic effectively co-opts the entire feminist movement, transforming it from a force for progress into a tool for social control. This co-option mirrors the misuse of "decolonization," where genuine efforts to address historical injustices are overshadowed by narratives that glorify oppressive pasts.

The Karnataka government’s recent introduction of the "anti-fake news" law exemplifies this concerning trend. While seemingly aimed at combating misinformation, the law’s vague terminology creates ample room for misuse. Terms like "fake news" and "misinformation" lack clear definitions, leaving them open to subjective interpretation and potential abuse. This ambiguity allows for the suppression of legitimate criticism and dissent under the guise of combating falsehoods.

Critics argue that such laws, regardless of their stated intent, can be easily weaponized to silence dissenting voices. Historical precedents demonstrate how similar legislation has been used to stifle freedom of expression, critical thinking, and dissent. The vagueness of the Karnataka law, combined with the current political climate, raises serious concerns about its potential for overreach and its chilling effect on free speech. Organizations like the Internet Freedom Foundation have voiced their concerns, urging the Karnataka government to reconsider the law’s implications on fundamental rights.

The manipulation of feminism and other progressive ideals is a dangerous trend that undermines the very principles they represent. By redefining these concepts to fit their own agendas, right-wing ideologies effectively silence those who challenge the status quo. This appropriation not only harms the feminist movement but also threatens the foundations of a democratic society. The Karnataka "anti-fake news" law serves as a stark reminder of the potential for these seemingly well-intentioned laws to be used as tools of repression.

The need of the hour is to reclaim these crucial concepts from their abusers. This requires a concerted effort to expose the manipulative tactics being employed and to reaffirm the true meaning of these ideals. It also necessitates a vigilant defense of free speech and the right to dissent, which are essential for a thriving democracy. The future of progressive movements in India hinges on the ability to resist these insidious attempts at co-option and to reclaim the narrative. Only then can we ensure that these vital concepts continue to serve as forces for positive change.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

Read More

Gadkari Denies Reports of Two-Wheeler Tolls, Condemns Misinformation

June 26, 2025

Report: Misinformation Erodes Trust Among Filipino Prosumers

June 26, 2025

Strategies for Countering Misinformation

June 26, 2025

Our Picks

EU Commission Cites Big Tech’s Insufficiency in Combating Disinformation

June 26, 2025

Big Tech’s Insufficient Efforts to Combat Disinformation

June 26, 2025

EU Commission Cites Big Tech’s Insufficient Disinformation Efforts

June 26, 2025

Report: Misinformation Erodes Trust Among Filipino Prosumers

June 26, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Don't Miss

Disinformation

Escalation of Middle Eastern Disinformation Threatens Pacific Stability.

By Press RoomJune 26, 20250

Escalating Israel-Iran Conflict Fuels Disinformation Wave in the Pacific The escalating conflict between Israel and…

Strategies for Countering Misinformation

June 26, 2025

Combating Deepfakes in Africa: A Critical Battle Against Digital Disinformation

June 26, 2025

The Perils of Misinformation in Meat Science Research

June 26, 2025
DISA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact
© 2025 DISA. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.