A Surge of Disinformation Targets Los Angeles Immigration Protests, Exploiting Latino Communities
Los Angeles has been gripped by protests against immigration raids, fueled by the Trump administration’s stringent immigration policies. Dramatic scenes of burning cars and clashes with law enforcement have flooded social media, but alongside genuine footage, a wave of disinformation has emerged, particularly targeting Spanish-speaking Latino communities. This disinformation campaign seeks to falsely link the protests to socialist and communist governments, echoing similar tactics used during the 2020 George Floyd protests and pro-Palestinian demonstrations.
The disinformation takes various forms, from fabricated images to misleading videos and text posts. One widely circulated post baselessly claims links between immigration protest groups and the "Venezuelan mafia," the Cuban Communist Party, and Mexico’s ruling Morena party, without offering any supporting evidence. The narrative promotes the idea that the protests are orchestrated by leftist forces rather than a spontaneous response to immigration raids. Former President Trump, on his platform Truth Social, has amplified this narrative by referring to protestors as "Paid Insurrectionists!". This targeted misinformation campaign further exacerbates existing political tensions and fuels distrust within the Latino community.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and California Governor Gavin Newsom have become specific targets of this disinformation. A manipulated image of Bass with Fidel Castro, originally a photo of Castro with Nelson Mandela, has been circulated online, attempting to link her to the former Cuban leader. While Bass has acknowledged past trips to Cuba, including one with the Venceremos Brigade, the doctored image represents a deliberate attempt to misrepresent her history.
The disinformation campaign exhibits a clear pattern of tailoring its messaging to specific audiences. While English-language disinformation focuses on general accusations of leftist influence, Spanish-language content directly targets elected officials like Bass and Newsom, using terms like "extreme left" and "communism" to resonate with anxieties within the Latino community. This targeted approach underscores the calculated nature of the disinformation campaign, aiming to exploit existing political and cultural divides.
The spread of disinformation has even reached the federal government. Conservative and pro-Russian social media accounts shared a video of Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, falsely claiming she encouraged the protests. This narrative was picked up by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who accused Sheinbaum of promoting violent protests during an Oval Office briefing. Sheinbaum vehemently denied these accusations, highlighting how disinformation can infiltrate official channels and distort the understanding of events.
Another common tactic involves the use of communist symbols, such as the hammer and sickle, taken out of context to portray the protests as a communist movement. One widely viewed post labels the protests as "URBAN COMMUNIST TERRORISM," exploiting pre-existing fears and stereotypes about communism. Simultaneously, some Spanish-language accounts with large followings openly glorify violence against “progressive anti-ICE protestors," creating a highly charged and polarized online environment.
Experts attribute the prevalence of Spanish-language disinformation to several factors. Fake accounts in Spanish are less likely to be detected and shut down by social media platforms compared to English-language accounts. The increased use of marketing companies employing fake accounts on behalf of political entities also contributes to this problem. This proliferation of disinformation erodes trust in institutions, fuels partisan divides, and undermines the possibility of constructive dialogue and compromise. While the exact balance between deliberate manipulation and the viral nature of social media in spreading disinformation is difficult to determine, its impact on shaping public perception and political discourse is undeniable.
