Syria’s Digital Battlefield: Foreign-Based Accounts Fuel Misinformation and Sectarianism
Syria, a nation grappling with the aftermath of a tumultuous government change, finds itself embroiled in a new battleground – the digital realm. A BBC Arabic investigation has uncovered a pervasive campaign of misinformation and hate speech emanating from foreign-based social media accounts, aiming to destabilize the nascent administration and incite sectarian violence. The investigation, focusing on the period following the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s government in December, analyzed over 400,000 posts on X (formerly Twitter). The findings reveal a disturbing trend of manipulated narratives and coordinated online activity designed to inflame tensions and sow discord within Syrian society.
The probe identified at least 50,000 posts spreading false or unreliable information about the new administration led by Ahmad al-Sharaa. Significantly, the majority of these posts, approximately 60%, originated from accounts located outside of Syria, including Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon, and Iran. This external influence raises concerns about regional actors seeking to exploit Syria’s fragile political landscape for their own agendas. The misinformation campaign employed various tactics, including the fabrication of events, the manipulation of existing content, and the coordinated dissemination of identical posts across multiple accounts. This orchestrated approach suggests a deliberate strategy to amplify false narratives and maximize their impact.
One prominent example highlighted by the BBC involved the false claim that the priest of the Greek Orthodox Mar Elias Church near Damascus had been executed by forces associated with al-Sharaa. This fabricated story, accompanied by identical images, rapidly circulated on X, prompting fear and outrage before being debunked by the church itself. Another instance involved a video purporting to show a member of al-Sharaa’s forces destroying a statue of the Virgin Mary. The BBC investigation traced the video back to 2013, exposing its manipulative use in the current context. These incidents illustrate the deliberate manipulation of information to fuel sectarian tensions and undermine the new administration’s authority.
Beyond fabricated stories, the BBC investigation uncovered evidence of coordinated online campaigns both supporting and opposing al-Sharaa. While approximately 80,000 posts, predominantly from Turkey and Saudi Arabia, expressed support for the new leader, these too exhibited signs of coordinated online manipulation. Conversely, the investigation also documented over 100,000 posts spreading hate speech and inciting violence against Alawis, a religious minority group in Syria. Many of these inflammatory posts were traced back to Saudi Arabian and Turkish-based accounts, raising further concerns about regional involvement in stoking sectarian tensions. This dual-pronged approach, employing both pro and anti-government narratives, suggests a calculated strategy to exacerbate existing divisions within Syrian society.
The consequences of this online misinformation campaign are far from virtual. The BBC report links the spread of sectarian hate speech to real-world violence, including the killing of hundreds of Alawi civilians in March. The Syrian Network for Human Rights documented the deaths of 1,334 civilians during this period, the majority of whom were Alawis, killed amidst escalating violence and security crackdowns. While the violence stemmed from a complex array of factors, the BBC investigation highlights the role of online misinformation in fueling animosity and exacerbating tensions. False narratives depicting Alawis as “infidels” and “criminals” circulated widely online, contributing to a climate of fear and hostility.
Another stark example of the real-world impact of online disinformation involved a fabricated recording purporting to show a Druze religious leader insulting the Prophet Muhammad. This fabricated recording quickly spread online, sparking deadly clashes between pro-government fighters and local Druze gunmen south of Damascus. The violence resulted in dozens of fatalities, underscoring the dangerous consequences of manipulating religious sensitivities in a volatile environment. The BBC investigation found that while the initial calls for violence emerged within Syria, they were subsequently amplified and promoted by accounts abroad, including in Iraq and Saudi Arabia, further widening the conflict.
The BBC’s investigation sheds light on the complex interplay between online misinformation and real-world violence in Syria. The findings suggest that foreign-based actors are actively exploiting social media platforms to manipulate public opinion, incite sectarianism, and destabilize the country’s fragile political landscape. The coordinated nature of these campaigns, employing bots, simultaneous postings, and consistent talking points, points to a deliberate strategy to maximize impact and sow discord. Expert analysis, cited by the BBC, suggests that both Iranian and Israeli agendas are being served by this coordinated disinformation campaign, adding another layer of complexity to the already volatile situation in Syria. As Syria navigates its transition, addressing the challenge of online misinformation and mitigating its real-world consequences will be critical to building a more peaceful and stable future.
