Close Menu
DISADISA
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
Trending Now

TikTok Introduces “Footnotes” Feature for Combating Misinformation in the United States.

July 31, 2025

Disinformation’s Threat to Civil Service Integrity

July 31, 2025

Refugee Narratives Challenge Immigration Misinformation in Tulsa

July 31, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
DISADISA
Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
DISADISA
Home»Social Media»Proposed FTC Chair Advocates for Reduced Antitrust Measures and Penalties for Content Moderation on Social Media
Social Media

Proposed FTC Chair Advocates for Reduced Antitrust Measures and Penalties for Content Moderation on Social Media

Press RoomBy Press RoomDecember 16, 2024
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Trump Nominates Andrew Ferguson as FTC Chair, Sparking Free Speech Concerns

Former President Donald Trump has designated Federal Trade Commissioner Andrew N. Ferguson as his nominee for FTC chair, igniting a heated debate over free speech and government overreach. Trump lauded Ferguson on Truth Social as a stalwart defender of free speech against Big Tech censorship, echoing similar praises for his FCC chair nominee, Brendan Carr. Both appointments raise alarms given the nominees’ track record of advocating policies that could stifle free expression rather than protect it.

Ferguson’s vision for the FTC, as outlined in a leaked document, reveals a troubling agenda. He aims to transform the independent agency into an arm of the executive branch, subservient to the president’s will. This includes purging "uncooperative bureaucrats" and prioritizing Trump’s personal agenda over the agency’s congressionally mandated responsibilities. This proposed politicization of an independent agency raises serious concerns about the integrity and impartiality of the FTC’s operations.

Furthermore, Ferguson intends to curtail the FTC’s role in regulating artificial intelligence (AI), a rapidly evolving field with significant implications for the U.S. economy and consumer protection. Despite growing concerns about algorithmic bias, privacy violations, and the potential for job displacement, Ferguson seeks to dismantle the FTC’s nascent efforts to address these critical issues. This stance is particularly alarming given the exponential growth of AI and its increasing influence on various aspects of daily life.

The nominee’s stance on online content moderation poses a direct threat to free speech. Ferguson advocates forcing social media platforms to host content that violates their terms of service, even if it constitutes hate speech or disinformation. He further proposes penalizing advertisers who choose not to associate their brands with such content, essentially compelling them to fund potentially harmful and offensive material. This approach undermines the platforms’ and advertisers’ own First Amendment rights to curate content and control their brand image.

Ferguson’s agenda also extends to targeting the medical community’s provision of gender-affirming care. He proposes launching investigations against medical professionals offering such care, a move that critics decry as discriminatory and harmful to transgender individuals seeking essential healthcare. This politically motivated targeting of healthcare providers further demonstrates a disregard for individual rights and medical expertise.

Free Press Co-CEO Jessica J. González condemned Ferguson’s nomination, labeling it extreme and a chilling violation of First Amendment freedoms. She emphasized that public opinion firmly supports platforms’ right to moderate content, citing a Free Press poll where 72% of Americans across the political spectrum endorsed the removal of hateful and racist content. González urged the FTC to prioritize consumer protection in areas like discriminatory AI systems and data privacy, rather than pursuing an ideological agenda that infringes upon free speech. She characterized these appointments as part of a broader trend within the Trump administration to suppress activism and dissent, raising concerns about the future of free expression under such leadership. The selection of Ferguson underscores the ongoing tension between regulating harmful online content and preserving the principles of free speech, highlighting the complex challenges faced by regulatory bodies in the digital age.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

Read More

Disinformation’s Threat to Civil Service Integrity

July 31, 2025

Garda Commissioner to Confer with Media Regulator Regarding Disinformation After Dublin Assault

July 31, 2025

The Proliferation of Misinformation on Social Media

July 30, 2025

Our Picks

Disinformation’s Threat to Civil Service Integrity

July 31, 2025

Refugee Narratives Challenge Immigration Misinformation in Tulsa

July 31, 2025

Government Coalition Investigates Foreign Interference in Elections, Including Online Misinformation

July 31, 2025

Men Misled by Passive News Consumption of Health Information

July 31, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Don't Miss

Social Media

Garda Commissioner to Confer with Media Regulator Regarding Disinformation After Dublin Assault

By Press RoomJuly 31, 20250

Dublin Garda Attack Sparks Disinformation Concerns and Calls for Social Media Accountability A violent attack…

The Propagation of Transgender Misinformation in Media and its Impact on Discriminatory Legislation

July 31, 2025

The Impact of Misinformation on Memory in Sexual Assault Cases

July 30, 2025

CGS Report Identifies 324 Instances of Political Misinformation in June

July 30, 2025
DISA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact
© 2025 DISA. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.