Ottawa County Settles Lawsuits, Sparking Renewed Scrutiny Over Severance Payouts to Former Employees
Ottawa County, Michigan, has recently settled two lawsuits, one concerning alleged Open Meetings Act violations and the other regarding Freedom of Information Act violations, for a total of $39,500. While the settlements aim to resolve legal disputes, they have reignited controversy surrounding the circumstances of generous severance packages granted to two former county employees in December 2022. The payouts, totaling over $280,000, were given to former Interim County Administrator Ben Wetmore and his executive aide, Jordan Epperson, shortly before a new board of commissioners took office. The timing and size of the severance packages have raised questions about transparency and the potential misuse of taxpayer funds.
The controversy centers on allegations made by current County Commissioner Jordan Jorritsma against former Board Chair Joe Moss. Jorritsma claims Moss presented misleading information during a closed-door meeting on December 10, 2022, leading to the inflated severance payout for Epperson. According to Jorritsma, Moss asserted that a contracted human resources attorney recommended a substantial severance for Epperson following a complaint filed by Epperson against the county. However, Jorritsma contends that the attorney never made such a recommendation. This discrepancy has fueled suspicions about the motives behind the significant severance package and whether proper procedures were followed.
The settlement of the Open Meetings Act lawsuit, filed by resident Dan Zimmer, stems from the December 10, 2022, meeting where the severance packages were approved. Zimmer argued that the board violated the Open Meetings Act by making decisions impacting public funds during a closed session. The settlement, while not an admission of guilt, suggests potential irregularities in the board’s actions. The Freedom of Information Act lawsuit settlement further underscores concerns about transparency within the county government.
Former Board Chair Joe Moss denies any wrongdoing and defends the severance packages as fair. He claims Jorritsma misunderstands the situation due to his absence from the December 10 meeting and lack of direct communication with Moss. This differing account of events creates a conflicting narrative about the circumstances surrounding the severance payouts and raises questions about the accuracy of information presented to the board during the closed session. The lack of clarity fuels public concerns about the propriety of the severance packages and the overall transparency of the decision-making process.
The controversy over the severance payouts is not an isolated incident within Ottawa County. Moss’s tenure as board chair was marked by several lawsuits alleging various forms of discrimination and unlawful termination. These legal battles have contributed to a perception of instability and controversy within the county government. The recent settlements, while attempting to resolve legal issues, have also brought renewed attention to the underlying issues of transparency and accountability.
The settlement of these two lawsuits marks a significant step towards resolving legal challenges facing Ottawa County. However, the lingering questions surrounding the severance payouts highlight the need for continued scrutiny and investigation into the circumstances of these decisions. The conflicting accounts offered by current and former county officials underscore the importance of transparency and open communication within government to maintain public trust. The controversies surrounding Moss’s tenure serve as a cautionary tale about the potential consequences of opaque decision-making and the vital importance of upholding ethical standards in public service. The ongoing debate highlights the need for clear policies and procedures regarding severance agreements to prevent future controversies and ensure responsible use of public funds.
