Yale Law Clinic Unveils Legal Blueprint to Combat Election Disinformation Using Reconstructed-Era Statute
New Haven, CT – In an era marked by the pervasive spread of election disinformation, a team of legal scholars from Yale Law School’s Media Freedom and Information Access (MFIA) Clinic has released a groundbreaking white paper that offers a novel approach to combating this insidious threat. The paper, titled “Using the Ku Klux Klan Act to Combat Election Disinformation: A Guide for Practitioners,” proposes leveraging the often-overlooked provisions of the 1871 Ku Klux Klan Act to hold purveyors of harmful election lies accountable. This legal strategy aims to provide a powerful tool for safeguarding the integrity of the democratic process while carefully navigating the complexities of First Amendment protections.
The Ku Klux Klan Act, originally enacted to suppress voter intimidation and violence during Reconstruction, contains provisions that the MFIA Clinic argues can be adapted to address the contemporary challenge of election disinformation. Specifically, the paper focuses on two key sections of the Act: the “Support-or-Advocacy” clauses of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) and the “Neglect-to-Prevent” provision of 42 U.S.C. § 1986. These sections, the authors argue, provide a framework for civil action against those who engage in conspiracies to spread disinformation that interferes with the right to vote.
The white paper meticulously outlines the legal basis for utilizing these provisions in the context of modern elections. It argues that § 1985(3) can be invoked when election-related disinformation originates from a conspiracy and constitutes a recognized common-law tort, such as intentional interference with the right to vote, misappropriation of likeness, or false-light invasion of privacy. Crucially, the disinformation must be perpetrated “on account of” an individual’s support for a federal candidate, establishing a direct link between the harmful act and the electoral process.
Furthermore, the guide explores the potential of § 1986 to hold third parties accountable for their complicity in the spread of disinformation. This provision, the authors explain, can be used to target entities like robocall vendors, group leaders, or even public officials who knowingly fail to prevent conspiracies to disseminate disinformation when they possess the power to do so. This aspect of the strategy aims to address the broader ecosystem that facilitates the spread of false information, targeting not only the creators of disinformation but also those who enable its propagation.
Recognizing the vital importance of upholding First Amendment rights, the white paper carefully delineates the circumstances under which legal challenges to election disinformation are likely to succeed without impinging on protected speech. It emphasizes that the First Amendment does not shield all forms of false speech, particularly when that speech constitutes a deliberate lie about election mechanics, impersonates a candidate, or poses a significant threat to the integrity of the electoral process. The report draws upon a wealth of legal precedent, historical context, and real-world examples, including deceptive social media campaigns promoting “texting to vote” and robocalls impersonating candidates, to illustrate the practical application of the proposed legal framework.
The MFIA Clinic’s guide offers a detailed roadmap for legal practitioners seeking to combat the scourge of election disinformation, providing a practical framework for navigating the complexities of the Ku Klux Klan Act and the First Amendment. It provides a step-by-step approach to building a case under these provisions, addressing key elements such as establishing the existence of a conspiracy, demonstrating the intent to interfere with voting rights, and proving the connection between the disinformation and support for a federal candidate. The guide also explores potential defenses that might be raised by those accused of spreading disinformation and offers strategies for overcoming these challenges.
The authors acknowledge the potential challenges in applying a Reconstruction-era statute to the contemporary digital landscape, but they argue that the core principles of the Ku Klux Klan Act remain relevant and potent in addressing the modern threat of election disinformation. They emphasize that the Act’s focus on protecting the right to vote from intimidation and interference aligns directly with the need to safeguard elections from the manipulative effects of disinformation. The guide aims to empower legal professionals with the knowledge and tools necessary to effectively challenge harmful election lies while respecting the boundaries of protected speech.
The release of this white paper marks a significant contribution to the ongoing effort to combat election disinformation and protect the integrity of democratic processes. By providing a clear legal pathway for holding purveyors of disinformation accountable, the MFIA Clinic’s guide offers a valuable resource for lawyers, civil rights organizations, and election officials seeking to defend the foundations of free and fair elections. The authors encourage further research and exploration of this legal avenue and invite inquiries from practitioners seeking to utilize the proposed framework in their efforts to combat election disinformation. They hope that this work will stimulate further discussion and collaboration among legal scholars, practitioners, and policymakers on the most effective strategies for addressing this critical challenge to democracy.
