Sudan’s Digital Battlefield: Disinformation and Propaganda Fueling the Ongoing Conflict
The devastating armed conflict that erupted in Sudan in April 2023 has not only ravaged the nation physically but has also ignited a parallel war in the digital sphere. Social media platforms have become battlegrounds for competing propaganda campaigns waged by the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), and Islamist factions aligned with the former regime. This "infodemic" of disinformation, hate speech, and manipulative narratives further fuels the conflict, exacerbates existing societal divisions, and undermines efforts towards a peaceful resolution.
The roots of Sudan’s disinformation crisis can be traced back to the post-2019 revolution period. Following the overthrow of Omar al-Bashir’s authoritarian regime, the online space became inundated with websites linked to the former ruling party’s Cyber Jihad Unit, disseminating propaganda against the democratic transition. This digital manipulation intensified in the lead-up to the October 2021 military coup, with social media flooded with fabricated news and rumors aimed at discrediting the civilian government and justifying military intervention. The current conflict has only amplified these tactics, transforming social media into a key instrument of war.
Both the SAF and the RSF are actively engaged in shaping domestic and international opinion through strategic communication campaigns. The RSF, leveraging years of investment in its online presence and the services of international PR firms, portrays itself as a guardian of democracy against Islamist forces, employing hashtags like #معركة_الديمقراطية ("battle for democracy"). Conversely, the SAF presents itself as the defender of Sudan’s unity and sovereignty against the RSF’s "mutiny," utilizing #معركة_الكرامة ("battle for dignity"). However, analysis reveals a stark contrast between the RSF’s sophisticated and consistent messaging and the SAF’s more limited and often contradictory online presence.
The RSF’s digital strategy has been particularly aggressive, with a significant focus on platforms like X (formerly Twitter). Before their accounts were suspended, the RSF disseminated daily statements, videos, and carefully curated content aimed at projecting a pro-democracy image, often utilizing revolutionary slogans and hashtags like #حراس_الثورة_المجيدة ("guardians of the glorious revolution"). This campaign, often presented in English, targeted both local and international audiences. Despite the suspension of official accounts, the RSF is accused of leveraging hijacked dormant accounts and networks based in countries like Israel and the UAE to continue its disinformation campaign. The SAF, while utilizing bots and trolls to amplify its message, relies more heavily on traditional media, particularly the state-controlled National Broadcasting Corporation.
Adding another layer of complexity to this digital conflict are the propaganda campaigns orchestrated by Islamist factions aligned with the former regime. These campaigns, while ostensibly supporting the SAF against the RSF, primarily target civilian political actors and pro-democracy groups, accusing them of treason and collusion with the RSF. This narrative aims to discredit and marginalize civilian voices advocating for peace, further polarizing Sudanese society and obstructing any potential for dialogue and resolution. Recent campaigns against civilian leaders visiting London and online calls for vetting citizens’ social media accounts exemplify this dangerous trend, effectively silencing dissent and paving the way for continued military dominance.
The consequences of this rampant disinformation are dire. Misleading information circulating online poses an immediate threat to the safety of civilians caught in the crossfire, disrupting access to vital resources and endangering lives as individuals rely on unreliable information for navigation and survival. Furthermore, these campaigns actively sabotage peace initiatives, as evidenced by the trending hashtag #الهدنة_خيانة_عظمى ("a truce is an act of treason"), which fuels public opposition to ceasefires and encourages further militarization.
In the long term, these orchestrated disinformation campaigns threaten to irrevocably damage Sudan’s social fabric. The constant barrage of divisive narratives, hate speech, and anti-civilian propaganda deepens existing societal fractures and hinders any possibility of reconciliation. The silencing of civilian voices and the erosion of trust in democratic processes create a fertile ground for authoritarian rule, where the military maintains absolute control and civic space is extinguished. Combating this digital war is not merely a matter of information management; it is a critical step towards securing a peaceful and democratic future for Sudan. Any meaningful effort towards resolving the conflict must prioritize addressing this parallel war of narratives and fostering a digital environment conducive to dialogue, reconciliation, and the restoration of civilian authority.