Close Menu
DISADISA
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
Trending Now

Russian Disinformation Campaign Targets Moldova’s Upcoming Elections

September 25, 2025

Combating Misinformation About Judaism: A New Podcast by Two Teenagers

September 25, 2025

CPD: Russia Disseminates Disinformation Regarding Global Conflict Following Alleged Downing of NATO Aircraft

September 25, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
DISADISA
Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
DISADISA
Home»News»Industry Experts Warn of Persistent “Deep Fake” Misinformation Threat in Local Elections.
News

Industry Experts Warn of Persistent “Deep Fake” Misinformation Threat in Local Elections.

Press RoomBy Press RoomApril 29, 2025No Comments
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Looming Threat of Election Interference Casts Shadow Over UK Local Elections

As voters across England prepare to head to the polls for local elections and a parliamentary by-election, concerns are mounting about the potential for online misinformation to sway the results, echoing the controversies that plagued the 2016 Brexit referendum. The rise of Nigel Farage’s Reform party adds another layer of complexity to the electoral landscape, with experts warning that the current legal framework is ill-equipped to combat the rapid spread of fake news and manipulative narratives on social media platforms.

The specter of the Vote Leave bus, emblazoned with the infamous and misleading promise of £350 million a week for the NHS, serves as a stark reminder of the power of misinformation to influence public opinion. The BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT, has issued a warning, highlighting the restrictions placed on mainstream media during polling day, which prevent them from effectively countering false narratives that may emerge online. This inability to debunk misinformation in real-time leaves voters vulnerable to manipulation, particularly in local elections where turnout is often lower and public attention less focused.

The 2016 Brexit referendum exposed the vulnerabilities of the electoral system to online manipulation. A parliamentary investigation revealed how social media bots were deployed to disseminate misinformation on a massive scale. Researchers identified thousands of accounts that flooded Twitter with misleading claims about immigration and other inflammatory issues, disappearing shortly after the polls closed. These coordinated efforts to manipulate public opinion underscore the urgent need for updated regulations to address the evolving tactics of online disinformation campaigns.

The impact of misinformation is not limited to online platforms. Lord Ashcroft’s analysis of the 2019 general election revealed that a significant percentage of voters made their final decision on polling day or while completing their postal ballots, highlighting the critical period during which misinformation can sway undecided voters. With the rise of deepfakes and other sophisticated forms of manipulation, the potential for interference in future elections is even greater.

The BCS is calling for an exemption to the current polling day reporting restrictions, allowing mainstream media outlets to fact-check and debunk false information in real-time. This proposal has gained support from a majority of IT professionals surveyed, who believe that such a measure would enhance voter confidence and ensure fairer and more transparent elections. By empowering trusted media sources to counter misinformation as it emerges, the public can be better informed and less susceptible to manipulation by bad actors.

The current regulations imposed by Ofcom prohibit discussion and analysis of election issues while polling stations are open, effectively silencing mainstream media during a crucial period. This restriction extends to the publication of opinion poll results, further limiting the information available to voters. With the 2024 UK general election on the horizon, experts warn that deepfakes could play a significant role in influencing the outcome, emphasizing the urgent need for a comprehensive review of electoral regulations to address the growing threat of online misinformation. The potential consequences of inaction are profound, jeopardizing the integrity of the democratic process and eroding public trust in the electoral system.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

Read More

Combating Misinformation About Judaism: A New Podcast by Two Teenagers

September 25, 2025

The Impact of Flagged Misinformation on Social Media Engagement

September 25, 2025

Navigating Misinformation: Introducing “The Reality Check” Series

September 25, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Our Picks

Combating Misinformation About Judaism: A New Podcast by Two Teenagers

September 25, 2025

CPD: Russia Disseminates Disinformation Regarding Global Conflict Following Alleged Downing of NATO Aircraft

September 25, 2025

The Impact of Flagged Misinformation on Social Media Engagement

September 25, 2025

Paige Bueckers’ On-Court Impact Drives Historic Social Media Milestone with Dallas Wings

September 25, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Don't Miss

Disinformation

Contested Transitions: The Siege of Electoral Processes

By Press RoomSeptember 25, 20250

Moldova’s Democracy Under Siege: A Deep Dive into the Information War Moldova, a small Eastern…

Navigating Misinformation: Introducing “The Reality Check” Series

September 25, 2025

Telegram Serves as Primary News Source for Half of Ukrainian Population, Survey Reveals

September 25, 2025

Obama Denounces Trump’s Dissemination of Harmful Misinformation Regarding Autism and Tylenol.

September 25, 2025
DISA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact
© 2025 DISA. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.