U.S. Representative Ashley Hinson (R-Iowa), currently campaigning for a U.S. Senate seat, recently hosted a gathering of agricultural leaders and pork producers at a Century Farm near Marshalltown to advocate for the “Save Our Bacon Act.” The event, which included Iowa Secretary of Agriculture Mike Naig and several prominent local farmers, served as a platform to challenge California’s Proposition 12. Speakers argued that the legislation, which imposes specific housing standards for breeding pigs and other livestock, represents a direct threat to Iowa’s family-run farms and the stability of the national pork industry.
The “Save Our Bacon Act,” which Hinson introduced last summer and sought to include in the federal Farm Bill, aims to prevent states like California and Massachusetts from setting animal welfare regulations that impact how producers in other states, such as Iowa, manage their livestock. Supporters contend that Prop 12 is driven by out-of-state activists rather than concerns for animal welfare, noting that the regulations have led to increased operational costs and higher pork prices for consumers across the country.
Industry leaders at the event emphasized that the issue is fundamentally one of interstate commerce. Speakers like Brian Feldpausch of the Iowa Farm Bureau warned that a fragmented regulatory landscape—where each state imposes its own unique production standards—is unsustainable for American businesses. They argued that a national marketplace requires a consistent set of rules, and warned that if Prop 12 remains unchallenged, it could set a dangerous precedent for other food products, ultimately squeezing small and midsize producers out of the market.
During the press conference, Hinson addressed criticism regarding her bill, specifically dismissing television advertisements that framed her legislation as a handout to corporations. She emphasized that complying with Prop 12 costs approximately $4,000 per sow, a figure that is manageable for large operations but potentially ruinous for small family farms. Hinson maintained that accusations surrounding her legislation serve to distract from the reality that Iowa farmers remain deeply committed to animal health and sustainability as a fundamental aspect of their livelihood.
The political stakes of the debate were highlighted as Hinson criticized her opponent in the upcoming Senate race, accusing him of aligning with “radical anti-ag activists” rather than defending Iowa’s interests. She questioned how any representative could support a mandate that undermines the state’s agricultural backbone, reaffirming her commitment to the Save Our Bacon Act. By framing the battle as a choice between supporting local farmers or bowing to outside influence, she positioned herself as a staunch defender of the state’s traditional agricultural way of life.
In addressing questions about her approach, Hinson noted that her legislation successfully balances states’ rights with the needs of national trade. According to the Congresswoman, the act does not prevent California from regulating its own producers, but it prevents the state from forcing those regulations upon Iowa farmers. As the legislative debate continues, the event signaled that local leaders remain unified in their opposition to the “patchwork of regulations” they believe threatens the future of the nation’s pork supply and the economic viability of rural Iowa.
