Former US Ambassador Warns of Information War Loss in Central Asia
Daniel Rosenblum ’84, former US ambassador to Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan, delivered a stark warning at Yale University, asserting that America has effectively “surrendered” the information war in Central Asia, ceding ground to the pervasive influence of Russia and China. Speaking on Friday, September 13, 2025, in the Humanities Quadrangle, Rosenblum addressed an audience of approximately 80 people, both in person and via Zoom, detailing the challenges faced by US diplomacy in the region.
Rosenblum’s lecture, titled “Battling the Firehose of Falsehood: Confronting Russian Disinformation in Central Asia,” was sponsored by several Yale organizations focused on international affairs and Central Asian studies. He recounted his six-year experience battling a relentless Russian disinformation campaign that sought to undermine US diplomatic efforts. He cited a 2023 incident where Russian media falsely claimed he had established a NATO base in Kazakhstan, when in reality he was inaugurating a US-funded conference center for a Kazakh peacekeeping institute. This incident, Rosenblum emphasized, highlighted the serious intent behind Russia’s disinformation tactics, despite the seemingly absurd nature of the claims.
The former ambassador outlined the US strategy employed to counter these narratives, which focused on showcasing tangible successes of American involvement in the region. These initiatives included health programs providing protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic, agricultural exchanges supporting local farmers, and educational partnerships facilitating Central Asian students’ studies at American universities. However, Rosenblum lamented the dismantling of much of this infrastructure since 2023, criticizing cutbacks to the State Department staff, the elimination of USAID programs, and the defunding of key media outlets like Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.
Rosenblum argued that these actions, culminating in what he perceived as a US surrender in the information war, have weakened America’s standing on the global stage. He further highlighted China’s expanding influence in Central Asia through the Belt and Road Initiative, acknowledging China’s effectiveness in building relationships and shaping public opinion. While China’s investment in infrastructure and language programs strengthens its regional influence, the US withdrawal creates a vacuum readily filled by competing narratives.
Looking forward, Rosenblum urged students to recognize the gravity of the situation, despite the seemingly daunting prospects for a renewed US strategy. He emphasized that while there are no physical casualties in this information war, the damage inflicted upon America’s reputation, diplomatic effectiveness, and ability to collaborate internationally on critical national interests poses a significant threat.
In a post-lecture interview, Rosenblum expanded on the challenges facing the United States, stressing the need for internal reflection regarding America’s global role. He framed the central question as a choice between engagement with the world or isolation, arguing that the latter path leads to diminished security and prosperity. This introspection, he argued, is crucial for determining the future direction of US foreign policy.
The event resonated with student organizers from Asian Crossroads at Yale, a student organization dedicated to promoting Central Asian awareness. They viewed Rosenblum’s lecture as a compelling example of their mission to elevate the region’s profile within academic and policy discussions. For Danat Kenzhegali ’26, the event held personal significance, offering insights into his home country of Kazakhstan from an American perspective. The experience of learning from a US ambassador who attended his own university underscored the interconnectedness of global affairs and the importance of diverse perspectives. Rosenblum’s talk served as a call to action, urging the audience to consider the implications of the unfolding information war and the vital role of informed engagement in shaping international relations.
The former ambassador’s warning about the loss of the information war in Central Asia underscores a broader concern about the decline of US influence on the global stage. His criticisms of policy decisions, particularly the reduction in diplomatic resources and the undermining of independent media, paint a picture of a retreating America ceding ground to its rivals. The consequences, he argues, are not only a diminished reputation but also a reduced capacity to promote American interests and values abroad.
Rosenblum’s focus on information warfare highlights the increasing importance of narratives and perception in international relations. The spread of disinformation, often amplified by state-sponsored media outlets, can erode public trust in democratic institutions and create fertile ground for authoritarian influence. The case of Central Asia, where competing narratives from Russia and China are filling the void left by a diminished US presence, serves as a cautionary tale.
The challenge for the United States, as Rosenblum points out, is not simply to counter disinformation but to offer a compelling alternative narrative based on shared values, mutual benefit, and a genuine commitment to international cooperation. This requires a reinvestment in diplomatic resources, a renewed focus on public diplomacy, and a willingness to engage with local communities on their own terms.
Finally, Rosenblum’s call for internal reflection underscores the importance of public debate about America’s role in the world. A clear understanding of national interests, coupled with a commitment to democratic values, is essential for crafting a sustainable and effective foreign policy. The stakes, as he makes clear, are high, and the consequences of disengagement extend far beyond the borders of Central Asia.