Bangladesh Unrest: Disinformation Fuels False Narrative of Hindu Genocide
The recent political upheaval in Bangladesh, marked by student protests and the resignation of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, has become a breeding ground for disinformation. A false narrative of a "Hindu genocide" has gained traction online, fueled by manipulated videos and misleading claims shared by far-right activists and Hindu-nationalist accounts. While violence and looting have impacted both Hindu and Muslim communities, the online narrative vastly exaggerates the targeting of Hindus and falsely attributes it to religious motivations.
The narrative gained momentum through viral posts, largely originating from India, falsely depicting attacks on Hindu temples and properties. One widely circulated video claimed to show a temple set ablaze by Islamists, but BBC Verify confirmed the building was an Awami League party office located near the undamaged temple. Another debunked claim involved a cricketer’s home, which actually belonged to a Muslim MP.
This disinformation campaign intentionally misrepresents the complexities of the situation in Bangladesh. While inter-religious tensions exist, the primary driver of the unrest has been political, with the Awami League, a party with both Hindu and Muslim members, being targeted by rioters. However, Hindu-nationalist narratives aim to portray the violence as religiously motivated attacks against Hindus, exacerbating existing tensions.
The reach of this disinformation extends beyond India and Bangladesh. Far-right figures like Tommy Robinson have amplified the false narrative to international audiences, sharing unverified videos and alleging a "genocide on Hindus." BBC Verify investigated one such video, which purportedly showed a Hindu woman pleading for her husband as their home was attacked by Islamists. The investigation revealed that the attack stemmed from a land ownership dispute involving both Hindus and Muslims, and the temple on the property remained unharmed.
Determining the precise motivations behind the violence in Bangladesh is challenging. While attacks have occurred, they are often intertwined with political affiliations, as the Hindu minority is perceived as largely supporting Sheikh Hasina’s secular Awami League. AFP fact-checkers have confirmed attacks on Hindu properties but emphasize that these are politically motivated incidents being misrepresented as religious persecution.
Amidst the escalating tensions and disinformation, heartwarming stories of interfaith solidarity have emerged. Muslim protesters, recognizing the divisive nature of the false narratives, have taken it upon themselves to guard Hindu temples, emphasizing their shared responsibility to protect each other. These acts of unity underscore the resilience of communities in the face of manufactured narratives aimed at sowing discord. The future of Bangladesh depends on upholding these values of coexistence and rejecting the divisive rhetoric proliferating online.
