Gilroy Fire Services Dispute Escalates: Commissioner Accuses Council Member of Spreading Misinformation
A heated debate over the future of Gilroy’s fire services has erupted into public accusations, with South Santa Clara County Fire Commissioner Joan Lewis denouncing City Council member Zach Hilton for allegedly disseminating false information about the status of South County Fire Engine 69 and the potential implications of consolidating with the Central Fire Protection District. Lewis contends that Hilton’s claims, particularly regarding the operational status of Engine 69, are categorically false and designed to undermine public trust in Cal Fire, the current provider of fire services for Gilroy.
At the heart of the controversy lies the operational readiness of Engine 69, a vital component of Gilroy’s fire protection network. Hilton allegedly asserted that the engine has been "shut down for the day," a claim that Lewis vehemently denies. While acknowledging that staffing reductions have occurred sporadically over the past five years due to unforeseen circumstances like employee illness, Lewis emphasizes that these instances have been rare and managed responsibly without compromising public safety. She accuses Hilton of deliberately misrepresenting the situation to further his personal agenda of consolidating Gilroy’s fire services with the Central Fire Protection District.
Lewis argues that Hilton’s advocacy for consolidation is fiscally irresponsible and raises serious questions about his true motivations. She highlights the significantly higher costs associated with Central Fire’s personnel and operations compared to Cal Fire, asserting that no corresponding improvement in service quality justifies the increased expenditure. Lewis champions Cal Fire as a financially sound alternative, providing comparable high-quality service at almost half the cost while preserving the local character and culture of the Gilroy Fire Department, including the iconic red fire engines cherished by the community.
Furthermore, Lewis emphasizes the advantageous benefits offered by Cal Fire to Gilroy firefighters, surpassing those available through Central Fire. These include an improved pension tier and spousal medical coverage in retirement. She also underscores the substantial long-term financial benefits for the city, as contracting with Cal Fire would shift the public pension burden from Gilroy to the state, bolstering the city’s financial outlook for generations to come.
The commissioner’s accusations escalate, directly questioning Council member Hilton’s motives and priorities. Lewis suggests that Hilton’s unwavering support for consolidation, despite what she describes as overwhelming evidence to the contrary, warrants scrutiny. She implies that his actions appear to prioritize the interests of a select group, specifically his associates within the Gilroy International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), over the broader community he was elected to serve.
This public clash underscores a deep divide within Gilroy regarding the future of its fire services. While Councilman Hilton advocates for consolidation with Central Fire, Commissioner Lewis champions the continued partnership with Cal Fire, emphasizing the financial prudence and comparable service quality offered by the state agency. The dispute centers not only on the best approach to fire protection but also on accusations of misinformation and questions of whose interests are being prioritized in this critical decision for the city. The ongoing debate raises concerns about transparency and accountability in local governance and the potential influence of special interests in shaping public policy.
