Social Media’s Unseen Hand: How Existing Tactics Shaped the 2024 UK General Election
The 2024 UK General Election, held against a backdrop of economic uncertainty and societal divisions, witnessed a renewed focus on the influence of social media on the democratic process. Concerns surrounding foreign interference and the spread of misinformation prompted platforms like TikTok, X (formerly Twitter), and Meta (parent company of Facebook and Instagram) to pledge investments in user protection measures and information integrity initiatives. While these companies claimed to be actively combating online manipulation, a closer examination reveals that the election was ultimately shaped by pre-existing tactics of misinformation and manipulation, raising serious questions about the efficacy of current regulatory frameworks and the very concept of an “election period” in the digital age.
The proliferation of deepfakes and AI-generated content dominated pre-election discourse, fueling anxieties about the potential for technologically advanced manipulation. However, the reality on the ground proved far less sensational. While the threat of sophisticated AI-driven misinformation looms large, the 2024 election demonstrated that traditional, well-honed tactics of distortion and manipulation continued to hold sway. The focus on futuristic threats inadvertently diverted attention from the more pressing and persistent issues of algorithmic biases and coordinated misinformation campaigns, which have long plagued the online landscape.
Investigations revealed coordinated efforts to discredit political figures through the dissemination of doctored videos and false narratives. One prominent example involved targeted attacks against Labour’s Wes Streeting, utilizing fabricated video clips and misleading commentary. Interestingly, these same tactics were previously deployed against Labour leader Keir Starmer during an earlier by-election, highlighting a pattern of coordinated online manipulation that extends beyond the immediate election cycle. This underscores the fact that social media’s impact on political discourse is continuous, not confined to designated election periods.
Social media platforms, often criticized for reactive rather than proactive measures, responded to some of the exposed manipulation tactics. X, notably under new ownership since the previous election, took action against accounts involved in spreading misinformation. However, this responsiveness, while welcome, appeared confined to the high-stakes election period. The episodic nature of platform engagement raises concerns about the long-term effectiveness of content moderation and the need for consistent vigilance against online manipulation, regardless of electoral cycles.
The crux of the issue lies in the evolving nature of political engagement in the digital age. The traditional concept of a discrete “social media election” is increasingly obsolete. The constant flow of information, misinformation, and opinion shaping on social media platforms has a continuous impact on public perception and political discourse. This necessitates a shift in approach, moving beyond reactive measures during election cycles to a more sustained and proactive effort to combat manipulation and promote information integrity.
The 2024 UK General Election, therefore, was not defined by novel AI-driven deepfake campaigns as many anticipated. Instead, it highlighted the enduring efficacy of established misinformation strategies, amplified by algorithmic biases and a lack of sustained platform accountability. The pre-election warnings about AI ultimately served as a distraction from the more fundamental and persistent challenges posed by the pervasive influence of social media on the political landscape. The election underscores the urgent need for a comprehensive and ongoing regulatory framework that addresses the evolving nature of online manipulation and protects the integrity of democratic processes in the digital age. The focus should shift from episodic interventions to continuous monitoring and proactive measures that address the underlying issues of algorithmic bias and coordinated misinformation campaigns, ensuring that democratic discourse is not unduly influenced by unseen forces operating in the digital realm.