California Refiners Exposed: Excessive Profits and Misinformation Unveiled at Oversight Hearing
SACRAMENTO, Calif. – A recent California Assembly oversight hearing brought to light startling revelations about the state’s refining industry, revealing a pattern of excessive profiteering and misleading reporting practices that have contributed to Californians enduring the highest gasoline prices in the nation. Data presented by the California Energy Commission (CEC) and the Division of Petroleum Market Oversight (DPMO) painted a clear picture of how major refiners, particularly those operating branded stations, have exploited their market power to extract exorbitant profits from consumers. While the data indicated a moderation in these excessive profits during 2024, following the implementation of state reforms enacted during legislative special sessions, the underlying issues of market manipulation and inflated operating costs remain a significant concern.
The core issue at hand is what has been dubbed the "mystery gasoline surcharge," an unexplained premium added to the price of gasoline at branded stations. Consumer Watchdog President Jamie Court argued that this surcharge is a direct result of branded refiners leveraging their market dominance to impose higher prices on station owners, who then pass the cost on to consumers. This "mafia-style shakedown scheme," as Court described it, adds an estimated 70 cents to every gallon of gasoline purchased in California. This premium is reflected in the persistent price gap between California and other states, which has averaged 41 cents per gallon higher since 2015, even after accounting for taxes, fees, and environmental program costs.
The data presented at the hearing highlighted several contributing factors to this price disparity. Since 2015, gross gasoline industry margins in California have surged by 36 cents per gallon compared to the rest of the U.S., peaking at a staggering $2.36 per gallon during the fall 2022 price spike. This surge in margins coincides with a period of increasing consolidation in the refining industry, with four companies controlling approximately 90% of in-state refining capacity and conducting roughly half of their sales through vertically integrated channels. This market concentration, projected to reach 98% after planned refinery closures, grants these companies significant leverage over pricing.
Further exacerbating the situation is the interplay between price spikes in the spot market and escalating branded markups. While spot market volatility plays a role, the consistent premium charged by major brands is a significant driver of higher prices. Data reveals a pattern of increasing markups at branded stations, with the "mystery gasoline surcharge" reaching a high of 72 cents per gallon since 2015. This disparity creates a stark divide within the refining sector, with large integrated refiners benefiting from their marketing and retail networks while smaller, non-integrated refiners struggle to stay afloat. Analysis by refiner type revealed that "unbranded focused" refiners consistently experience lower gross refining margins, making them more vulnerable to closure.
Adding to the complexity of the situation, the hearing also uncovered evidence of refiners inflating their reported "operating costs" to manipulate "net margins" data submitted to the state. While industry reports to investors indicated average operating costs of around 20 cents per gallon, refiners reported significantly higher expenses to the state, ranging from 60 to 80 cents per gallon. These inflated figures likely include costs associated with the production of jet fuel and diesel, obscuring the true cost of gasoline production. The CEC expressed concerns about the stability of existing refiners, particularly the "unbranded focused" ones, in light of recent refinery closures and the broader industry trends towards larger, high-capacity refineries in other countries.
The CEC also highlighted the impact of external factors on California’s refining landscape. The growth of super-refineries in countries like Mexico, Kuwait, Nigeria, and Oman poses a significant challenge to smaller refineries. Furthermore, the potential closure of a crude oil pipeline supplying Northern California refineries could further complicate the market and contribute to higher prices. CEC Vice Chairman Siva Gunda suggested increasing crude oil extraction in Kern County as a possible solution, asserting that this could be achieved without violating existing setback regulations between oil wells and communities. This proposal, however, is likely to face opposition from environmental groups and community advocates concerned about the environmental and health impacts of increased oil production. The hearing served as a stark reminder of the complex challenges facing California’s gasoline market and the need for greater transparency and accountability within the refining industry to protect consumers from excessive price gouging.