Close Menu
DISADISA
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
Trending Now

The Importance of Maintaining Information Superiority Against Disinformation Campaigns.

June 2, 2025

Combating Wildfire Misinformation through Humor and Empathy

June 2, 2025

Bulgarian Cyber Activists Combat Kremlin Disinformation and Atrocities

June 2, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
DISADISA
Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
DISADISA
Home»News»Conflicting Statements Arise Regarding Tory Lanez’s Guilt as Amber Rose Claims Innocence and Megan Thee Stallion’s Legal Team Denounces Misinformation
News

Conflicting Statements Arise Regarding Tory Lanez’s Guilt as Amber Rose Claims Innocence and Megan Thee Stallion’s Legal Team Denounces Misinformation

Press RoomBy Press RoomMay 31, 2025
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Amber Rose Sparks Controversy by Defending Tory Lanez, While Megan Thee Stallion’s Legal Team Denounces Claims as Misinformation

A firestorm of debate has erupted following model and actress Amber Rose’s recent public defense of rapper Tory Lanez, who was convicted in December 2022 of shooting fellow rapper Megan Thee Stallion. Rose’s comments, made during an appearance on the podcast "It’s Tricky With Raquel Harper," ignited a swift and sharp rebuke from Megan Thee Stallion’s legal team, who dismissed the defense as a "sad attempt to peddle misinformation." This latest development reignites the highly publicized case and throws a spotlight on the ongoing discussion surrounding the complexities of believing survivors of violence, particularly within the music industry.

Rose’s defense of Lanez centered around the intimate nature of the relationship between Lanez and Megan Thee Stallion. She posited that the shooting, which occurred in July 2020 after a Hollywood Hills party, could have been a crime of passion stemming from jealousy or a lovers’ quarrel. Rose argued that the scenario presented by prosecutors, wherein Lanez shot Megan from the backseat of an SUV after a heated argument, didn’t align with her understanding of their dynamic. She implied that the physical altercation and subsequent shooting were more likely the result of a heated exchange between two romantically involved individuals, rather than a calculated act of violence. This perspective directly contradicts the testimony presented during the trial, which included eyewitness accounts and forensic evidence supporting Megan Thee Stallion’s version of events.

Megan Thee Stallion’s legal representatives wasted no time in responding to Rose’s assertions. In a statement to various media outlets, her lawyers categorically denied any new evidence supporting Lanez’s innocence and firmly labeled Rose’s pronouncements as misinformation. They reiterated the strength of the evidence presented during the trial, which led to Lanez’s conviction on three felony counts: assault with a semiautomatic firearm, carrying a loaded, unregistered firearm in a vehicle, and discharging a firearm with gross negligence. The statement emphasized that the jury’s verdict was based on a comprehensive examination of the facts, including Megan Thee Stallion’s compelling testimony.

The clash between Rose and Megan Thee Stallion’s legal team underscores the persistent challenges faced by survivors of violence in having their experiences believed and validated. Rose’s comments, regardless of intent, inadvertently contribute to a narrative that often questions or minimizes the accounts of victims, particularly in cases involving interpersonal relationships. This dynamic can discourage survivors from coming forward and reporting abuse, fearing they will be disbelieved or blamed. The prompt and forceful response from Megan Thee Stallion’s legal team demonstrates their commitment to upholding the integrity of the trial’s outcome and protecting their client from further victimization through the spread of unsubstantiated claims.

The ongoing public discourse surrounding the case also highlights the influence of social media and celebrity platforms in shaping public opinion. Rose’s comments, amplified through her significant online presence, have the potential to sway public perception and fuel doubt about the established facts of the case. This underscores the need for responsible and informed public commentary, particularly when discussing sensitive topics like violence against women. The dissemination of misinformation can have detrimental consequences, potentially undermining the legal process and further traumatizing survivors.

This incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of supporting survivors, respecting the legal process, and critically evaluating information before contributing to public discourse on sensitive issues. The battle for justice extends beyond the courtroom and requires a collective effort to create a culture where survivors are believed, supported, and empowered to speak their truths.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

Read More

Combating Wildfire Misinformation through Humor and Empathy

June 2, 2025

AI Fact-Checking Processes Propagate Misinformation: An Inquiry

June 2, 2025

AI Chatbots’ Rise in Fact-Checking Hampered by Misinformation

June 2, 2025

Our Picks

Combating Wildfire Misinformation through Humor and Empathy

June 2, 2025

Bulgarian Cyber Activists Combat Kremlin Disinformation and Atrocities

June 2, 2025

AI Fact-Checking Processes Propagate Misinformation: An Inquiry

June 2, 2025

The Influence of Social Media on Peru’s 2026 General Election

June 2, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Don't Miss

Social Media

Cagayan de Oro Representative Introduces Legislation to Combat Disinformation Following Election Affected by Falsehoods

By Press RoomJune 2, 20250

Cagayan de Oro Lawmaker Proposes Bill to Criminalize Malicious Spread of Fake News Cagayan de…

AI Chatbots’ Rise in Fact-Checking Hampered by Misinformation

June 2, 2025

AI Fact-Checking Processes and the Propagation of Misinformation

June 2, 2025

AI Fact-Checking Processes Propagate Misinformation

June 2, 2025
DISA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact
© 2025 DISA. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.