Close Menu
DISADISA
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
Trending Now

Indonesia Calls Upon TikTok and Meta to Address Harmful Online Content

August 31, 2025

PTA Refutes Social Media Claims of Fake SIM Card Advisory

August 31, 2025

Disinformation Campaign Fuels Backlash Against Cracker Barrel Logo Change

August 31, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
DISADISA
Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
DISADISA
Home»News»Chidambaram Clarifies Statement on Pahalgam Attack and Condemns Misinformation.
News

Chidambaram Clarifies Statement on Pahalgam Attack and Condemns Misinformation.

Press RoomBy Press RoomJuly 28, 2025
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Chidambaram’s Remarks on Pahalgam Attack Spark Political Firestorm

New Delhi – A political tempest has erupted following senior Congress leader P. Chidambaram’s critique of the government’s handling of the Pahalgam terror attack and its aftermath. Chidambaram’s pointed questions about the investigation and the military response, Operation Sindoor, have drawn sharp rebukes from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), accusing him of giving “a clean chit to Pakistan.” The controversy unfolds as the Lok Sabha engages in a special discussion on Operation Sindoor, adding fuel to the already heated debate.

The controversy stems from an interview Chidambaram gave to The Quint, where he questioned the government’s narrative surrounding the April 22 attack that claimed the lives of 26 civilians in Jammu and Kashmir. He raised concerns about the lack of identification and apprehension of the attackers, questioning the assumption of Pakistani involvement without concrete evidence. He further challenged the government’s reluctance to disclose the progress of the National Investigation Agency’s (NIA) investigation and questioned the reported arrests of individuals who allegedly provided shelter to the terrorists.

Chidambaram’s remarks ignited a firestorm of criticism from the BJP. Union Minister Pralhad Joshi accused Chidambaram of echoing Pakistan’s stance, suggesting a pattern of downplaying Pakistan’s involvement in terror activities when the Congress was in power. BJP spokesperson Amit Malviya escalated the attack, accusing the Congress of consistently defending the enemy and questioning why opposition leaders often sound like Islamabad’s defense lawyers. These accusations have further polarized the political landscape and intensified the debate surrounding the government’s response to the Pahalgam attack.

Chidambaram vehemently denies these accusations, attributing the controversy to the manipulation of his interview by online trolls. He asserts that excerpts were taken out of context, words were muted, and the overall message was distorted to paint him in a negative light. He directs those interested in his complete and unedited perspective to the full interview available on The Quint. This attempt to clarify his position adds another layer to the ongoing political tussle, highlighting the increasing role of social media in shaping political narratives and the potential for misrepresentation.

The Lok Sabha’s special discussion on Operation Sindoor, India’s military response to the Pahalgam attack, serves as a backdrop to this escalating political row. The discussion is expected to delve into the details of the operation, its objectives, and its effectiveness. With tensions already high, Chidambaram’s remarks are likely to be a central point of contention during the parliamentary debate, further exacerbating the divide between the ruling party and the opposition.

This incident underscores the highly sensitive nature of national security issues in India’s political discourse. The Pahalgam attack, with its tragic loss of life, has become a focal point for political sparring, with both sides attempting to leverage the incident to their advantage. As the investigation continues and the Lok Sabha debates the military response, the political rhetoric surrounding the attack is likely to intensify, further blurring the lines between legitimate criticism and partisan politics. The focus, however, should remain on ensuring accountability, bringing the perpetrators to justice, and preventing future tragedies.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

Read More

The Impact of Political Misinformation and Rhetoric on Public Trust and Social Division

August 31, 2025

The Propagation of Misinformation through Persistent Sales Tactics

August 30, 2025

Automotive and Oil Industries Dismiss Public E20 Fuel Concerns as Unfounded.

August 30, 2025

Our Picks

PTA Refutes Social Media Claims of Fake SIM Card Advisory

August 31, 2025

Disinformation Campaign Fuels Backlash Against Cracker Barrel Logo Change

August 31, 2025

Ukrainian Intelligence Anticipates Increased Russian Disinformation Campaign Prior to Zapad-2025 Military Exercises

August 31, 2025

The Impact of Political Misinformation and Rhetoric on Public Trust and Social Division

August 31, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Don't Miss

News

The Propagation of Misinformation through Persistent Sales Tactics

By Press RoomAugust 30, 20250

Homeowner’s Quest for Eco-Friendly Landscaping Exposes Invasive Species Dilemma A homeowner’s well-intentioned effort to replace…

Automotive and Oil Industries Dismiss Public E20 Fuel Concerns as Unfounded.

August 30, 2025

Dissemination of Misinformation Regarding Voter Rights Initiatives, Ganesh Chaturthi Festivities, and Other Matters

August 30, 2025

Budanov Reports Intensified Russian Disinformation Campaign During Zapad-2025 Military Exercises

August 30, 2025
DISA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact
© 2025 DISA. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.