Trump’s Call for Federal "Takeover" of D.C. Sparks Outrage and Re-Ignites Statehood Debate
WASHINGTON, D.C. – President Trump’s recent derogatory remarks advocating for a federal "takeover" of the District of Columbia have ignited a firestorm of criticism, with many denouncing the comments as anti-democratic, misinformed, and deeply disrespectful to the city’s 700,000 residents. The President’s remarks, made in anticipation of an expected executive order concerning the District, have re-energized the ongoing debate surrounding D.C. statehood and brought the issue of local autonomy to the forefront of national discourse.
Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), a long-time champion of D.C. statehood, condemned the President’s comments as a continuation of anti-democratic rhetoric from Republicans regarding the District. Norton argued that these remarks are not only based on falsehoods but also represent a blatant attempt to disenfranchise the city’s majority-minority population. She emphasized that the fight for D.C. statehood is rooted in the fundamental American principles of consent of the governed and an end to taxation without representation, principles which she believes the President’s rhetoric directly contradicts.
Norton highlighted the District’s significant contributions to the nation, noting that D.C.’s population surpasses that of two states, its per capita federal tax payments exceed those of any state, and its total federal tax contributions surpass those of 21 states. She further underscored that D.C.’s gross domestic product outstrips that of 15 states and that its residents have served and sacrificed in every American war. These facts, Norton argues, make a compelling case for D.C. statehood and expose the hollowness of arguments against it.
The Congresswoman also directly addressed the President’s claim that the D.C. government is failing to adequately address crime. She countered this assertion with data from the Department of Justice, which indicates that violent crime in the District decreased by 35% in 2024 and that overall violent crime is at a 30-year low. This data, Norton argues, directly refutes the President’s characterization of the city’s crime situation and undermines his justification for federal intervention.
Adding fuel to the fire, Republican lawmakers have introduced bills in both the House and Senate aiming to repeal the Home Rule Act. This act, which grants the District a degree of self-governance, would be effectively nullified by these bills, abolishing the D.C. Council and the Mayor’s office. Such a move would leave the city reliant on members of Congress elected by other jurisdictions to manage its affairs, a prospect that has further alarmed D.C. residents and statehood advocates.
Despite these challenges, the push for D.C. statehood has achieved significant momentum in recent years. In 2020, the House of Representatives passed the D.C. statehood bill for the first time in history, a feat they repeated in 2021. When Congresswoman Norton reintroduced the bill at the start of the current Congress, it garnered 159 original cosponsors, the highest number for any bill introduced that day. Currently, the bill boasts 176 cosponsors. The Senate version of the bill, introduced by Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), launched with 40 original cosponsors and currently has 41. This growing support, Norton argues, demonstrates the increasing recognition of the injustice faced by D.C. residents and the growing momentum behind the statehood movement. The President’s remarks, while intended to derail these efforts, may inadvertently serve to further galvanize support for D.C.’s quest for full representation and equality within the American political system.
