Close Menu
DISADISA
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
Trending Now

Should Congress Investigate the Global Dissemination of Kremlin Disinformation by a Vice President?

July 7, 2025

France-India-US Mini Trade Agreement Nearing Completion Ahead of July 9th Deadline

July 7, 2025

Enterprise Businesses at Risk from Disinformation Campaigns

July 7, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
DISADISA
Newsletter
  • Home
  • News
  • Social Media
  • Disinformation
  • Fake Information
  • Social Media Impact
DISADISA
Home»Social Media»TikTok and Facebook’s Disinformation Mitigation Efforts Fall Short Prior to US Election
Social Media

TikTok and Facebook’s Disinformation Mitigation Efforts Fall Short Prior to US Election

Press RoomBy Press RoomDecember 17, 2024
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Facebook’s Election Disinformation Moderation: Progress in the US, Gaps Remain Globally

The 2021 attack on the US Capitol served as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of misinformation spreading unchecked on social media platforms. In response, Facebook, now under the umbrella of its parent company Meta, pledged to curb the proliferation of political content on its platform. This included reducing the visibility of such content in users’ feeds and shutting down Crowdtangle, a tool utilized by researchers to track viral trends. As the 2023 US elections approached, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg appeared to further distance himself from political matters, delegating key responsibilities and reportedly downsizing the election integrity team. This raised concerns about the platform’s commitment to combating election disinformation.

To assess the effectiveness of Facebook’s content moderation efforts, a recent investigation tested the platform’s ability to identify and reject false election information. Researchers submitted eight sample ads containing clear disinformation, bypassing the standard ad authorization process specifically designed for political advertising. These ads were crafted to directly violate Facebook’s stated policies, which prohibit the spread of misinformation about voting procedures, eligibility, and candidate participation. The results revealed a marked improvement compared to previous tests conducted in 2022.

While Facebook rejected seven out of the eight ads submitted, one misleading ad slipped through the cracks. This problematic ad falsely claimed that a valid driver’s license is required to vote, a blatant misrepresentation of US voting laws. Although only a minority of states require photo identification, and even those do not mandate a driver’s license specifically, the ad was approved, exposing a vulnerability in Facebook’s moderation systems. While the rejection of the majority of the test ads suggests improvement since 2022, where acceptance rates for similar disinformation ads ranged between 20% and 30%, the fact that any such ad was approved remains a significant concern.

The simplicity of the disinformation used in the test ads raises further questions about Facebook’s ability to detect more nuanced and sophisticated forms of manipulation. The blatant nature of the test ads should have made them easy to identify and reject. The fact that one still slipped through highlights the limitations of automated moderation systems and the need for human oversight. The investigation’s findings underscore the ongoing challenge of effectively combating election disinformation, particularly as bad actors employ increasingly sophisticated tactics. The ease with which blatantly false information can still bypass Facebook’s defenses raises serious doubts about the platform’s preparedness for more subtle forms of manipulation.

Furthermore, while Facebook appears to have made strides in addressing election disinformation within the US, its global track record paints a less encouraging picture. A previous investigation in Brazil revealed a stark contrast, with Facebook approving 100% of ads containing election disinformation. Even after being informed of these findings, a retest showed that while Facebook’s detection processes had improved, they still approved half of the resubmitted disinformation ads. This discrepancy in performance raises concerns about the equitable application of content moderation policies across different regions and elections. The stark difference between the US and Brazil results suggests that resource allocation and enforcement efforts may be disproportionately focused on certain regions, leaving others vulnerable to manipulation.

The inability of Facebook to consistently detect and remove even blatant election disinformation across its global platform underlines the urgent need for comprehensive and consistent enforcement of its policies. This concerning trend suggests that the resources dedicated to combating disinformation, including human moderators and advanced detection algorithms, may be unevenly distributed. The lack of response from Meta to inquiries about these findings further compounds concerns about transparency and accountability. Addressing this disparity requires a commitment to investing in robust moderation systems and ensuring their effective deployment across all languages and regions, not just those deemed politically significant. The failure to address these global vulnerabilities undermines trust in the platform and risks further erosion of democratic processes worldwide.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email

Read More

Enterprise Businesses at Risk from Disinformation Campaigns

July 7, 2025

Chinese Diplomatic Efforts to Undermine Rafale Sales Following Operation Sindoor, as Revealed by French Intelligence

July 6, 2025

Republican Pressure on Social Media Companies to Cease Combating Election Misinformation

July 6, 2025

Our Picks

France-India-US Mini Trade Agreement Nearing Completion Ahead of July 9th Deadline

July 7, 2025

Enterprise Businesses at Risk from Disinformation Campaigns

July 7, 2025

Chinese Diplomatic Efforts to Undermine Rafale Sales Following Operation Sindoor, as Revealed by French Intelligence

July 6, 2025

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Vaccine Advisory Committee Translates Misinformation into Policy Recommendations

July 6, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Don't Miss

News

Misinformation’s Human Element: Rejecting Algorithmic Determinism

By Press RoomJuly 6, 20250

Nick Clegg: Don’t Blame Algorithms — People Like Fake News Former UK Deputy Prime Minister…

Should Congress Investigate the Global Dissemination of Kremlin Disinformation by a Vice President?

July 6, 2025

France Alleges Disinformation Campaign Targeting Rafale Jets Following India’s Operation Sindoor, Implicating China and Pakistan.

July 6, 2025

Intelligence Report: Chinese Disinformation Campaign Targeting French Rafale Jets to Promote Domestic Aircraft Sales

July 6, 2025
DISA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact
© 2025 DISA. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.