The Unholy Alliance: How the Russian Orthodox Church Fuels Putin’s War Machine
The Kremlin’s invasion of Ukraine isn’t simply a geopolitical power play; it’s a carefully orchestrated campaign steeped in religious rhetoric, designed to galvanize domestic support and sow discord in the West. At the heart of this strategy lies a revitalized alliance between the Russian state and the Orthodox Church, a partnership that blends political expediency with spiritual pronouncements to justify aggression and demonize opponents. This resurgence of an age-old dynamic, where the church acts as a powerful instrument of state control, raises alarming questions about the weaponization of faith and the erosion of religious integrity.
Historically, the Russian Orthodox Church has enjoyed a close relationship with the ruling power, epitomized by Tsar Nicholas II’s fervent religiosity. Suppressed during the Soviet era, Orthodoxy experienced a dramatic revival after the collapse of communism, accompanied by a reimagining of the concept of "Russkiy Mir" (Russian world), which acquired a distinct spiritual dimension alongside its geopolitical implications. This fusion of political and religious identity, championed by Patriarch Kirill, has provided fertile ground for the Kremlin to frame its expansionist ambitions as a defense of Russo-Christian values.
Kirill’s rise to the Patriarchate in 2008 marked a pivotal moment in this unholy alliance. His public praise of Putin as "a miracle from God" solidified the church’s subservience to the Kremlin. Kirill’s direct involvement in politics, notably during the 2011-2013 anti-government protests, further cemented this bond. This politicization has extended beyond Russia’s borders, with Kirill echoing Putin’s neo-imperialist rhetoric, advocating for the reintegration of former Russian territories, including Ukraine, into the Patriarchate’s fold. This religious justification for territorial expansion provides a potent narrative for domestic consumption and resonates with certain segments of the Western population susceptible to narratives of Christian persecution.
Beneath the veneer of spiritual leadership, Patriarch Kirill’s past reveals a more complex figure. Formerly a KGB agent known as Vladimir Gundyayev, Kirill amassed a vast personal fortune through shrewd business dealings after the fall of the Soviet Union, exploiting his position within the church to secure lucrative import monopolies. This opulent lifestyle, marked by lavish renovations to his residences and a multi-billion dollar net worth, starkly contrasts with the image of humility and piety he projects. This glaring hypocrisy underscores the inherent corruption within the Russian Orthodox Church, which prioritizes material wealth and political influence over genuine spiritual guidance.
The Kremlin and the church engage in a mutually beneficial exchange: Kirill lends religious legitimacy to Putin’s wars, while the Kremlin ensures the church’s continued power and financial prosperity. This religious validation resonates particularly with segments of the Western population susceptible to narratives of Christian persecution, exemplified by figures like Jordan Peterson and Viktor Orbán, who promote a romanticized view of resurgent Christianity in Russia. This narrative, often amplified by right-wing media outlets, conveniently overlooks the church’s complicity in the Kremlin’s aggressive foreign policy and its internal corruption.
The narrative of a Christian revival in Russia, however, is largely a fabrication. Church attendance remains low, and the much-touted construction of new churches masks the reality of dwindling congregations. The Kremlin skillfully manipulates religious anxieties in the West, particularly among those who feel threatened by secularism, portraying Russia as a defender of traditional Christian values against a godless, liberal West. This strategy exploits genuine concerns within certain Christian communities, twisting them to serve the Kremlin’s geopolitical agenda.
The claim that Christianity is under threat in Ukraine is another key component of this disinformation campaign. The ban on the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate) was not a suppression of religious freedom, but a necessary response to the church’s deep infiltration by Russian intelligence operatives. These agents were actively involved in espionage, mercenary recruitment, and even directing artillery strikes. The Ukrainian state, in safeguarding its national security, replaced the compromised church with an independent Ukrainian Orthodox Church consecrated by the Patriarch of Constantinople. The narrative of religious persecution is thus a cynical manipulation designed to deflect attention from the Kremlin’s aggression and the church’s complicity.
The Russian Orthodox Church’s activities extend beyond Ukraine, serving as a cover for espionage and influence operations across Europe. From purchasing properties near military installations in Sweden and Norway to establishing suspected spying hubs in France, the church’s reach is extensive. The expulsion of church officials from Bulgaria and Estonia further underscores the church’s role in disseminating extremist rhetoric and promoting division, threatening the national security of these countries. These actions expose the church’s true nature as an arm of the Russian state, actively engaged in undermining democratic institutions and advancing the Kremlin’s geopolitical ambitions.
The Kremlin’s embrace of religious rhetoric is not an expression of genuine faith but a calculated political maneuver. Putin’s occasional public displays of piety are carefully crafted performances intended to project an image of spiritual leadership. This cynical manipulation of religious sentiment serves as a potent tool in the Kremlin’s disinformation arsenal, both domestically and internationally. By exploiting anxieties about secularism and religious freedom, the Kremlin cultivates sympathy and support among Western audiences while masking its true intentions. Recognizing this strategy is crucial to counteracting the Kremlin’s narrative and understanding the complexities of the ongoing conflict.
