The Insidious Threat of Disinformation in Democratic Elections: The Case of Australia’s 2025 Federal Election
Australia’s upcoming federal election on May 3rd, 2025, is set against a backdrop of escalating misinformation and disinformation campaigns. While some misinformation is unintentional, disinformation is a deliberate and organized attempt to deceive the public, mirroring the strategies of conventional advertising. The effectiveness of these campaigns, though difficult to quantify due to ethical limitations on research, poses a significant threat to democratic processes and societal cohesion. Studies suggest that disinformation can subtly shift public opinion, potentially swaying close elections and even undermining the legitimacy of electoral outcomes, as witnessed in the 2024 Romanian presidential election. This threat has been recognized globally, with the World Economic Forum identifying misinformation and disinformation as a major short-term risk.
Beyond Election Outcomes: The Erosion of Trust and the Rise of Harmful Narratives
The most insidious consequence of disinformation, however, extends beyond influencing election results. It lies in its capacity to manipulate dominant societal narratives, fostering mistrust in science and established institutions. The false narrative linking 5G towers to COVID-19, for instance, led to acts of vandalism that endangered lives. Similarly, disinformation campaigns surrounding vaccine safety have contributed to a substantial number of preventable deaths, exceeding the combined US military fatalities in multiple major conflicts. These examples highlight the real-world harm caused by the erosion of trust in scientific consensus, driven by strategically crafted disinformation narratives.
The Profit Motive Behind Disinformation: From Big Tobacco to Fossil Fuels
The history of disinformation reveals a pattern of financially motivated campaigns by powerful industries. The tobacco industry’s infamous strategy of manufacturing doubt about the harms of smoking, orchestrated by PR firm Hill & Knowlton, set a precedent for other sectors. Fossil fuel companies, chemical manufacturers, and pharmaceutical giants have all employed similar tactics to downplay the risks associated with their products and activities. These campaigns, designed to protect profits, have delayed crucial regulations and inflicted widespread harm on public health and the environment.
Disinformation in Australian Politics: The Nuclear Energy Debate and Vaccine Skepticism
The Australian political landscape is not immune to the influence of disinformation. The debate surrounding nuclear energy exemplifies this trend, with some politicians promoting it as a cost-effective alternative despite evidence from the CSIRO, Australia’s national science agency, indicating it is significantly more expensive than renewables. This disregard for scientific findings mirrors a broader trend of science denial, evident in the renewed attacks on vaccine science in the US, which have found their way to Australia. Victoria’s measles outbreak, fueled by declining vaccination rates, serves as a stark reminder of the real-world consequences of such disinformation campaigns.
The Illusory Truth Effect: How Repetition Reinforces False Beliefs
The effectiveness of disinformation relies on the psychological principle of the illusory truth effect: repeated exposure to a claim, especially from authority figures, increases its believability regardless of its veracity. This strategy is amplified by media outlets that strive for “balanced” reporting, often giving equal weight to scientifically unfounded viewpoints alongside established scientific consensus. This practice, exemplified in the climate change debate, creates a false impression of controversy and fuels public doubt about well-established scientific facts.
The Long-Term Impact: A Fragmented and Less Rational Society
The continuous barrage of misinformation and disinformation during the Australian federal election will inevitably sow doubt and erode trust in scientific evidence. This manipulation of information will shape beliefs and interpersonal interactions, potentially leading to a more fragmented and less rational society. The ultimate consequence of disinformation may not be a dramatic shift in election outcomes, but rather a subtle yet profound erosion of trust, critical thinking, and social cohesion, leaving Australia more vulnerable to manipulation and division.
