Nepal’s Infodemic: Misinformation Grips Nation Amidst Protests
Nepal recently witnessed a wave of protests and unrest that gripped the nation. As citizens turned to online platforms for real-time updates, a parallel crisis emerged: an “infodemic” of misinformation. The rapid spread of false and misleading information exacerbated fear and panic, adding another layer of complexity to the already volatile situation. This infodemic, reminiscent of the one experienced during the Covid-19 pandemic, highlighted the vulnerabilities of the information ecosystem during times of crisis.
The chaotic environment, coupled with the public’s thirst for information, created a breeding ground for misinformation. False narratives about the army taking over, the restoration of the monarchy, and the nationality of prominent figures circulated widely. Old videos were repurposed, and exaggerated claims about events spread like wildfire. One particularly dangerous example involved a video falsely claiming protesters vandalized the Pashupatinath Temple, exploiting religious sentiments and risking further unrest. Similarly, inaccurate reports regarding the health of political figures and the movement of military vehicles further fueled anxiety and speculation.
Several factors contributed to this infodemic. Weak digital and media literacy made it difficult for individuals to discern fact from fiction. The slow and inadequate communication from official sources created a vacuum that was quickly filled by unverified reports from individuals and opportunistic actors. The lack of preparedness from civil society, media organizations, and even social media platforms themselves allowed the misinformation to proliferate unchecked. Doxing, the nonconsensual sharing of personal information, became widespread, leading to real-world consequences, including vandalism of targeted homes.
The emotional instability of the population played a significant role in amplifying the spread of misinformation. High emotions tend to impair critical thinking, making individuals more susceptible to sharing unverified claims. Even well-intentioned attempts to warn others about potential threats could inadvertently spread panic due to the lack of verification. Experts recommend cautious sharing of information and prioritizing private flagging with disclaimers to avoid amplifying potentially false narratives.
What made this infodemic particularly concerning was its reach. Unlike previous instances where misinformation primarily affected those with lower media literacy, this time, even informed individuals within professional circles – doctors, civil servants, media members – fell victim to and propagated false information. The trust inherent within these smaller groups made the misinformation more persuasive. Speculation quickly morphed into reported “fact,” further muddying the waters. Rumors surrounding potential political successors and the president’s status gained traction both domestically and internationally, demonstrating how online speculation can escalate during a crisis.
The events exposed a critical need for stronger media literacy programs and proactive fact-checking initiatives. Experts urge the public to verify information before sharing and to rely on trustworthy sources. Digital rights organizations also need to play a more proactive role in alerting the public to potential misinformation narratives, especially in the lead-up to elections or during times of unrest. Swift intervention and timely communication from official sources remain crucial in combatting the spread of misinformation. Ultimately, every individual with access to information has a responsibility to be vigilant and verify before sharing, creating a collective defense against future infodemics.
