The 2017 Tour de France: A Race Defined by Social Media
The 2017 Tour de France will be etched in cycling history not only for the thrilling on-road battles between Chris Froome, Romain Bardet, and Rigoberto Urán, but also for the unprecedented influence of social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. The race’s most controversial moments transcended the asphalt, igniting fierce debates and influencing the narrative in real-time. From slow-motion video replays dissecting contentious crashes to passionate outpourings of support and condemnation, social media became an omnipresent force, blurring the lines between spectator and participant.
The Peter Sagan disqualification, following a collision with Mark Cavendish in stage 4, epitomized the power of social media to shape perceptions and even potentially influence outcomes. Initial footage seemed to incriminate Sagan, triggering a torrent of online criticism directed at the Bora-Hansgrohe rider. However, subsequent slow-motion videos, rapidly disseminated across social media, offered a different perspective, suggesting Cavendish might have inadvertently contributed to the crash. The online sentiment shifted dramatically, transforming condemnation into support for Sagan. This rapid reversal underscored the volatile nature of online judgment and the susceptibility of narratives to evolving evidence presented through social media.
The incident’s aftermath exposed contrasting approaches to social media management. While Bora-Hansgrohe strategically avoided engaging in the online debate, choosing to focus on the official appeals process, Cavendish and his Dimension Data team took a more direct approach. Team director Roger Hammond’s tweet calling for Sagan’s expulsion backfired, generating a backlash that forced him to deactivate his account. Cavendish himself pleaded with fans to cease online harassment directed at his family, highlighting the darker side of social media’s influence, where passionate engagement can devolve into personal attacks.
The Sagan incident appeared to cast a long shadow over the remaining stages of the Tour. Riders seemed increasingly wary of attracting negative online attention, opting for silence in the face of potential controversy. When Nacer Bouhanni punched Jack Bauer during stage 10, both riders remained tight-lipped, avoiding any public commentary, particularly online. Bauer later admitted to consciously avoiding fanning the flames of online debate, recognizing the potential for social media to amplify and distort incidents beyond proportion. This cautious approach reflected a growing awareness among riders of the pervasive reach and potential consequences of social media engagement.
The influence of social media extended beyond individual riders, impacting team strategies and even interacting with the UCI’s decision-making process. When Rigoberto Urán received a time penalty for taking a water bottle outside the designated zone, Cannondale-Drapac team boss Jonathan Vaughters launched a full-scale social media campaign to challenge the decision. He leveraged Twitter and Instagram to highlight perceived inconsistencies in the ruling, directly tagging the UCI’s official accounts and encouraging fan engagement. Vaughters’ live-tweeting of his interactions with UCI officials, complete with updates on their responsiveness (or lack thereof), created unprecedented transparency and applied public pressure on the governing body.
The UCI ultimately reversed the penalty, though officially denying any influence from social media. This episode sparked debate on the legitimacy of using social media to pressure cycling’s governing bodies. While some viewed it as a powerful tool for accountability and transparency, others raised concerns about its potential to undermine official processes and create undue influence. Regardless of one’s perspective, Vaughters’ strategy demonstrated the potential for social media to become a strategic lever in challenging official decisions and shaping the narrative around controversial incidents.
The 2017 Tour de France marked a turning point in the relationship between cycling and social media. It transitioned from being a platform for sharing highlights and fan engagement to a powerful force capable of influencing perceptions, shaping narratives, and even impacting race outcomes. The events of the 2017 Tour underscored the need for teams, riders, and governing bodies to navigate the complex landscape of social media strategically, recognizing its potential for both positive engagement and damaging repercussions. As social media’s influence continues to grow, its role in shaping the future of cycling remains a topic of ongoing discussion and evolution.
