The Double-Edged Sword of Influencer Marketing: FOMO, Attachment, and Well-being Among Young Consumers
In today’s digital age, social media influencers wield significant power over consumer behavior, especially among younger demographics. A recent study published in PLOS One delves into the complex relationship between online shopping, Fear of Missing Out (FOMO), influencer attachment, and well-being among young adults. The findings reveal a nuanced dynamic where FOMO can negatively impact well-being, while strong connections with influencers can offer a surprising antidote.
The study, led by Abbey Bartosiak during her doctoral studies at The Ohio State University, surveyed 863 U.S. adults aged 18-40 who were active social media users and followed at least one influencer. Researchers assessed participants’ levels of FOMO, attachment to influencers, online shopping habits, and their perceived social, psychological, and financial well-being. The results shed light on the intricate interplay between these factors in the context of influencer marketing.
FOMO, traditionally associated with missing social events, manifests in the online shopping sphere as a fear of not keeping up with the latest trends. The study confirms that this "trend-based FOMO" is a legitimate phenomenon with tangible consequences for well-being. Participants experiencing higher levels of FOMO reported lower levels of social, psychological, and financial well-being, reinforcing the negative impact of constantly chasing fleeting trends.
However, the study also reveals a powerful countervailing force: attachment to social media influencers. Participants who reported stronger attachments to influencers experienced enhanced social and psychological well-being. This suggests that the parasocial relationships formed with influencers can provide a sense of connection and belonging, mitigating the negative effects of FOMO. The perceived advice and validation offered by influencers can boost consumers’ confidence in their purchase decisions and overall lifestyle choices, contributing to a more positive sense of self.
The study’s most surprising finding pertains to financial well-being. Contrary to the initial hypothesis that influencer attachment would lead to increased spending and financial regret, the results showed a positive correlation between influencer attachment and financial well-being. While the study relied on self-reported data and lacked objective financial information, this unexpected outcome warrants further investigation. Researchers speculate that the perceived value and satisfaction derived from influencer-recommended purchases might outweigh any potential financial strain, contributing to a positive perception of financial well-being.
The rapid growth of influencer marketing underscores the importance of understanding its impact on consumer behavior. This study provides valuable insights into the complex interplay between FOMO, influencer attachment, and well-being. While influencer marketing can foster a sense of community and belonging, it also raises concerns about overconsumption and its long-term effects on individuals and society.
Further research is needed to explore the nuances of this relationship and to develop strategies for promoting responsible consumption in the age of influencer marketing. Understanding the psychological mechanisms underlying these trends is crucial for both consumers and marketers to navigate the increasingly complex landscape of online shopping and social media influence. The study highlights the need for a balanced approach that acknowledges the potential benefits of influencer engagement while mitigating the risks associated with FOMO and overconsumption.
