Information Manipulation: The Biggest Threat to Canadian Democracy
The digital age has ushered in an era of unprecedented access to information, but it has also opened the floodgates to manipulation and disinformation. A recent report on foreign interference in federal elections identified information manipulation as the single greatest threat to Canadian democracy. This threat was starkly illustrated during the recent federal election, where sophisticated disinformation campaigns, amplified by emerging technologies like generative AI, targeted political parties and candidates.
One of the most striking examples of this manipulation involved a coordinated online campaign against Liberal leader Mark Carney. A cybersecurity firm, Cyabra, uncovered a network of fake social media profiles spreading false and defamatory claims about Carney. These profiles, operating across Twitter (now X), Facebook, and Instagram, disseminated fabricated images and narratives linking Carney to disgraced figures like Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The online smear campaign even spilled over into the real world, with a heckler confronting Carney at a rally with accusations stemming from the online disinformation.
Cyabra’s analysis revealed the sophisticated nature of these campaigns, with nearly a quarter of the accounts identified as fake, exhibiting bot-like behavior such as synchronized posting and the absence of personal details. A separate analysis during the election period showed a similar surge in inauthentic activity targeting the Liberal party, portraying Carney as an elitist and the political system as corrupt, discouraging voters from supporting the Liberals. These findings underscore the insidious nature of online disinformation, hijacking democratic discourse and manipulating public opinion.
While the Liberals were a primary target, other parties were not immune. Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre’s image was misused in cryptocurrency scams, demonstrating the diverse tactics employed by malicious actors. The speed and reach of online disinformation campaigns pose a significant challenge, often outpacing efforts to debunk false narratives. The increasing sophistication of AI-generated content further exacerbates this problem, making it increasingly difficult to distinguish between authentic and fabricated information.
Beyond the election, concerns persist about the influence of foreign powers in shaping the Canadian information landscape. The 2025 election saw continued attempts to sow discord, including the exploitation of Canada-US relations by foreign media outlets and the amplification of divisive narratives by American conspiracy theorists. Furthermore, a coordinated online influence campaign originating from China was detected on the WeChat platform, targeting a Conservative candidate critical of the Chinese government. The potential for platforms like TikTok, with its vast reach and algorithmic control, to be used for political manipulation also remains a significant concern.
The generational shift in news consumption habits adds another layer of complexity to the disinformation challenge. Younger demographics increasingly rely on social media for news, making them particularly vulnerable to online manipulation. While legacy media outlets still enjoy a degree of trust among older generations, the younger demographic’s reliance on platforms like X, Instagram, and TikTok, which lack rigorous fact-checking mechanisms, raises serious concerns about the future of informed democratic participation.
Addressing this multifaceted threat requires a comprehensive approach. While technology can play a role in identifying and flagging disinformation, the responsibility for removing harmful content ultimately lies with the social media platforms. However, these platforms have shown a reluctance to actively moderate content. The absence of robust regulatory frameworks in Canada, similar to the EU’s Digital Services Act, further hinders efforts to combat disinformation. Non-legislative initiatives, such as Finland’s proactive approach to media literacy education, offer valuable lessons. By incorporating critical thinking and digital literacy into school curriculums, Finland has empowered its citizens to become discerning consumers of information, a model that Canada could emulate to build resilience against disinformation. Ultimately, safeguarding Canadian democracy in the digital age demands a concerted effort involving government, social media platforms, educational institutions, and individuals alike.
