Thai Media Organizations Rebuke Cambodian Counterparts Over Disinformation Allegations and Demand Action on Fake News
Bangkok, Thailand – July 31, 2025 – In a strongly worded joint statement, three prominent Thai media organizations, the Thai Journalists Association (TJA), the Society for Online News Providers (SONP), and the National Union of Journalists Thailand (NUJT), have vehemently rejected accusations of unethical reporting leveled against them by the Club of Cambodian Journalists (CCJ). The Thai organizations condemned the CCJ’s statement, which criticizes Thai media coverage of the Thai-Cambodian border situation, as a blatant interference in their internal affairs and an unfounded attack on their professional integrity.
The Thai media bodies have issued a stern call to the CCJ to cease its unwarranted intervention and instead focus on addressing the pervasive issue of fake news and disinformation emanating from within Cambodia. They highlighted several instances of fabricated information originating from Cambodian sources, including baseless claims regarding the use of chemical weapons and high-yield bombs by the Thai military against Cambodian civilians, and the false report of a Thai general’s death. These fabricated narratives, the Thai organizations argue, have fueled misunderstandings and heightened tensions between the two nations.
The Thai media groups underscored their commitment to ethical self-regulation and adherence to the highest standards of journalistic practice. They emphasized their dedication to reporting accurately, impartially, and without inciting animosity between the two countries. They reaffirmed their belief in the importance of press freedom and the public’s right to access accurate information, crucial for fostering peace and understanding in the border region. The organizations expressed concern that the CCJ’s actions appeared to align more with the Cambodian government’s narrative than with the principles of independent journalism, raising serious questions about its objectivity and credibility.
The TJA, which had previously established a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the CCJ to promote media cooperation, announced the temporary suspension of this partnership in response to the CCJ’s actions. This decision reflects the TJA’s deep disappointment with the CCJ’s conduct and its unwillingness to uphold the principles of journalistic integrity. The TJA stated that the suspension will remain in effect until the CCJ demonstrates a genuine commitment to addressing the spread of disinformation and returns to its role as an independent advocate for press freedom.
The joint statement represents a significant escalation in the ongoing tension between media organizations in Thailand and Cambodia. It highlights the challenges posed by cross-border disinformation and the need for responsible journalism in mitigating conflict and promoting peaceful relations. The Thai media organizations’ call for accountability and a return to ethical principles serves as a crucial reminder of the vital role of a free and independent press in fostering understanding and stability in the region.
The situation underscores the complexities of media relations in Southeast Asia, particularly in the context of border disputes and political tensions. It also raises broader questions about the role of journalist organizations in combating disinformation, promoting professional ethics, and navigating the delicate balance between national interests and the pursuit of truth. The future of the relationship between the TJA and CCJ, and the broader media landscape in the region, hinges on the CCJ’s response to these demands and its willingness to re-commit to the core principles of journalistic integrity.
