Telecom Operators Threaten USSD Service Disruption Over Banks’ Unpaid Debts and Misinformation
Nigeria’s telecommunications landscape is on the brink of a major disruption as leading operators threaten to withdraw support for Unstructured Supplementary Service Data (USSD) banking services. The Association of Licensed Telecom Operators of Nigeria (ALTON), representing major players like MTN Nigeria, Airtel, Globacom, and 9Mobile, accuses banks of disseminating "deliberate misinformation" regarding USSD billing and failing to settle substantial outstanding debts. This standoff could severely impact millions of Nigerians, particularly those in rural areas who rely heavily on USSD for financial transactions.
The controversy stems from a recent agreement among the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), telecom operators, and banks to transition to an End-User Billing (EUB) model for USSD transactions. Under the EUB model, charges for USSD banking services would be deducted directly from users’ mobile airtime balances instead of their bank accounts. Several banks recently notified customers that this change would take effect on June 3, 2025, citing a directive from the NCC. However, ALTON vehemently disputes this portrayal, asserting that the banks are misrepresenting the terms of the agreement and attempting to deflect responsibility for their unpaid debts.
ALTON Chairman Gbenga Adebayo clarifies that the shift to EUB was not a unilateral NCC directive but a collaborative agreement among all stakeholders. Crucially, the agreement stipulated that banks must clear all outstanding USSD debts owed to telecom operators by June 2, 2025, before implementing the new billing system. According to Adebayo, while a few banks have made partial payments, the majority remain in default, rendering the proposed June 3, 2025 implementation date untenable.
Adebayo expressed strong disapproval of the banks’ public pronouncements, accusing them of distorting the facts and attempting to manipulate public opinion. He emphasized that the telecom operators’ insistence on debt settlement is not merely a financial matter but a crucial step to protect consumers from potential double billing, where they could be charged both through their airtime and bank accounts.
The potential consequences of this impasse are significant. USSD banking has become a cornerstone of financial inclusion in Nigeria, enabling millions to access banking services, especially in areas with limited internet access or traditional banking infrastructure. If telecom operators follow through with their threat to withdraw USSD support, it could severely restrict access to financial services for a large segment of the population, potentially reversing years of progress in financial inclusion.
The telecom operators’ ultimatum underscores the critical role of USSD in Nigeria’s financial ecosystem and the complex interplay between telecommunications and banking sectors. The ongoing dispute highlights the need for transparency and accountability in implementing new billing models and the importance of resolving outstanding financial obligations to ensure the continued availability of essential financial services for all Nigerians. The looming deadline of June 2, 2025, adds urgency to the situation, emphasizing the need for a swift resolution to avert a potentially disruptive crisis in the financial services sector. The coming weeks will be crucial in determining whether the parties can reach a compromise or whether millions of Nigerians will face restricted access to vital financial services.
The telecom operators emphasize that the agreement hinges on the timely settlement of outstanding debts and accuse banks of attempting to shift public blame onto the NCC and telecom operators. This has led to a tense standoff, with the potential for widespread disruption of financial services. The situation highlights broader issues within the Nigerian financial sector, including the need for transparency, accountability, and effective collaboration between key stakeholders.
The potential consequences of a USSD service disruption are far-reaching. Millions of Nigerians, particularly in underserved communities, rely on USSD for basic banking transactions. A disruption could significantly hinder their ability to access financial services, impacting businesses, individuals, and the overall economy. The current standoff underscores the urgent need for a resolution that protects consumer interests and ensures the continued stability of the financial ecosystem.
The disagreement over USSD billing and outstanding debts reveals deeper tensions between the telecom and banking sectors in Nigeria. While both industries play crucial roles in facilitating financial transactions, their interests sometimes diverge, leading to conflicts like the current one. Resolving this dispute requires open communication, good-faith negotiations, and a commitment to finding a solution that benefits all stakeholders, particularly the end-users who depend on these services.
The ongoing situation serves as a reminder of the interconnectedness of various sectors within the Nigerian economy. Disruptions in one sector can have cascading effects on others, highlighting the need for collaborative approaches to address challenges and ensure the smooth functioning of critical services like mobile banking. The USSD dispute is not just a technical issue; it has far-reaching implications for financial inclusion and the overall economic well-being of Nigerian citizens.
The telecom operators’ stance is clear: They will not implement the EUB model until banks fulfill their financial obligations. This firm position puts pressure on the banks to address the outstanding debts and engage in constructive dialogue to resolve the impasse. The coming days and weeks will be critical in determining whether a compromise can be reached or whether Nigeria faces a major disruption in mobile banking services.
The Nigerian public is closely watching the developments, as the outcome of this dispute will directly impact their access to essential financial services. The government, through the NCC and CBN, has a crucial role to play in mediating the situation and ensuring that a resolution is reached that protects consumer interests and promotes the stability of the financial sector. The successful resolution of this dispute will require a commitment from all stakeholders to prioritize the needs of the Nigerian public and work towards a sustainable and equitable solution.
