Social Justice Organizations Rethink X Presence Amid Misinformation Concerns
A recent survey conducted by the Barrow Cadbury Trust has revealed a growing unease among social justice organizations regarding their continued presence on the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. The survey, which polled 415 of the Trust’s funded partners and stakeholders, primarily charities, found that a significant 84% of the 128 respondents to a key question were actively reviewing or considering reviewing the platforms they utilize for outreach and engagement. This wave of introspection comes in the wake of increasing concerns about X’s role in disseminating misinformation and fostering a hostile online environment. The Trust itself is contemplating its own strategy on X, while simultaneously exploring alternative platforms like Bluesky.
The survey data highlights a broader shift in the social media landscape for the non-profit sector. While X still commands a substantial presence, with 26% of respondents reporting its use, other platforms like LinkedIn (27%), Instagram (18%), and Facebook (17%) maintain comparable levels of engagement. Interestingly, newer platforms like Threads and Bluesky are showing nascent adoption rates, suggesting a potential migration towards these alternatives. This trend reflects a growing disillusionment with X, particularly in light of its perceived political shift, declining analytics accessibility, and increasingly negative user experience. Several respondents explicitly voiced their concerns about X’s role in the spread of disinformation, hate speech, and violence, particularly following the recent UK riots.
The Barrow Cadbury Trust acknowledges the historical effectiveness of X as a campaigning and engagement tool, yet recognizes the potential of other platforms to reach new and existing audiences. The Trust views the survey as a starting point for a broader sectoral discussion on navigating the evolving social media landscape. While acknowledging the need to avoid isolating their organizations from existing X communities, the Trust is actively exploring alternatives like Bluesky. This dual approach reflects the complex challenge facing these organizations: balancing the need for reach with the imperative to uphold their values and operate in an environment conducive to positive social impact.
The decision by several prominent charities, including ACEVO, the Race Equality Foundation, and Colchester and Ipswich Hospitals Charity, to abandon X following the recent UK riots underscores the growing seriousness of these concerns. These organizations cite X’s perceived contribution to the spread of misinformation and harmful rhetoric as a primary reason for their departure. This exodus highlights a fundamental tension between the potential reach offered by platforms like X and the ethical responsibilities of organizations committed to social justice. The growing polarization of online discourse and the proliferation of misinformation pose significant challenges for organizations striving to maintain a positive and constructive online presence.
The survey responses also reveal a nuanced understanding of the challenges inherent in migrating away from established platforms. While many organizations express concerns about X, they also acknowledge the platform’s significant reach and the difficulty in replicating that audience engagement elsewhere. This dilemma underscores the importance of strategic planning and careful consideration of alternative platforms before making a transition. Simply abandoning X without a clear strategy for engaging audiences on other platforms risks isolating organizations and limiting their impact. The challenge lies in finding a balance between maintaining reach and upholding organizational values in an increasingly complex and polarized online environment.
The broader implications of this trend extend beyond the social justice sector. As online platforms grapple with issues of misinformation, hate speech, and algorithmic bias, organizations across various sectors are increasingly reevaluating their social media strategies. The decisions made by these organizations will shape the future of online discourse and the role of social media in shaping public opinion. The ongoing dialogue within the social justice sector, as exemplified by the Barrow Cadbury Trust survey, represents a critical step in navigating this evolving landscape and ensuring that online spaces remain conducive to constructive dialogue and positive social change. The challenge is to find a way to leverage the power of social media for good while mitigating the risks posed by its darker aspects. The search for new platforms and strategies signifies a broader effort to reclaim online spaces for constructive engagement and positive social impact.
