Disinformation Campaign Targets Judge in South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol’s Impeachment Trial
SEOUL, South Korea – A torrent of disinformation, including fabricated child pornography claims, accusations of communist sympathies, and forged social media posts, has targeted Judge Moon Hyung-bae, the interim head of South Korea’s Constitutional Court, as he presides over the impeachment trial of suspended President Yoon Suk Yeol. The court is deliberating on whether to uphold a parliamentary vote to remove Yoon from office following his controversial attempt to impose martial law in December. With legal experts predicting Yoon’s removal next month, his conservative People Power Party (PPP) and allies have unleashed a wave of false and defamatory accusations against Judge Moon, aiming to discredit the impeachment process and undermine the judiciary’s authority.
The disinformation campaign reached a fever pitch with the dissemination of a manipulated image purporting to show Judge Moon commenting on a post containing child pornography. This claim, amplified by the PPP, led to demands for Moon’s resignation and accusations of consuming pornography. The party later retracted the allegation and apologized after it was revealed that the image was fabricated by combining an unrelated comment by Moon with a graphic image. Despite the retraction, Yoon’s supporters continued to brandish signs accusing Moon of being a "porn judge" outside the impeachment hearings. This incident underscores the rapid spread and enduring impact of disinformation, even after debunking.
The fabricated image spawned further disinformation, including a fake news report falsely attributing a dismissive statement about the pornography allegations to opposition leader Lee Jae-myung. The broadcaster named in the fabricated report confirmed it was fake news and considered legal action against those who propagated it. These fabricated stories exemplify the sophisticated tactics employed in the disinformation campaign, exploiting the potential for rapid dissemination online and the difficulty in controlling the narrative once false information gains traction.
Beyond the pornography accusations, the disinformation campaign has employed various tactics to discredit Judge Moon. Images depicting him speaking in front of a Chinese flag were circulated, falsely implying allegiance to Beijing and playing into existing anxieties about Chinese influence in South Korean politics. A fabricated Elon Musk post condemning a "corrupt judge" was also falsely attributed to Moon. Senior PPP official Kwon Seong-dong spread false claims about Moon’s ties to the opposition leader, further fueling the narrative of bias and impropriety. These multiple, interconnected false narratives create a cumulative effect, eroding public trust in the judge and the impeachment process itself.
Analysts view this disinformation campaign as a deliberate attempt to undermine South Korea’s democratic institutions, particularly the judiciary. With Yoon’s removal seeming likely and snap elections on the horizon, the PPP appears intent on delegitimizing the impeachment process and influencing public opinion. Professor Bai Byoung-inn of Kookmin University links the campaign to the upcoming elections, suggesting the PPP aims to delay the trial and control the narrative surrounding Yoon’s removal. He also notes that the increasing extremism of Yoon’s supporters has contributed to the escalation of these attacks, effectively pulling the ruling party further to the right and preventing them from distancing themselves from Yoon’s controversial actions.
Despite the severity of the accusations and the potential damage to his reputation, Judge Moon has not pursued legal action against those spreading the disinformation. The Constitutional Court, while refraining from commenting on individual claims, has firmly rejected accusations of bias, emphasizing that the impeachment judgment will be based solely on the constitution and laws, not on the justices’ personal leanings. The court has expressed concern about the potential damage to the judiciary’s authority caused by the disinformation campaign, highlighting the broader implications of such attacks on democratic institutions. The situation raises critical questions about the role of disinformation in political discourse and its potential to erode public trust in the judicial process and democratic governance in South Korea.
