Railroad Workers Face Renewed Betrayal as Union Pushes Through Job-Cutting Contract
A simmering conflict within the railroad industry is reaching a boiling point as the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers-Transportation Division (SMART-TD) aggressively promotes a new crew consist agreement with BNSF Railway. This agreement, which has already been rejected once by the rank-and-file, paves the way for significant job losses through the elimination of conductor positions and the introduction of a new, all-encompassing ground-based role. The union’s efforts to suppress dissent and portray the agreement as a victory have been met with widespread anger and accusations of a sellout.
The SMART-TD leadership, acutely aware of the growing distrust among its members, has launched a public relations offensive to defend the unpopular agreement. Using videos and online statements, union officials, including Local Chairman Matt Lenz, attempt to reframe the inevitable job cuts resulting from automation as a positive development, claiming the new “Road Utility Position” (RUP) is a win for workers. However, this new role is effectively a downgraded version of the conductor position designed to absorb the duties of multiple existing roles, ultimately facilitating the transition to single-person crews. This thinly veiled attempt to sweeten a bitter pill has not fooled railroad workers, who recognize the RUP as a stepping stone to widespread job losses.
Critics of the agreement, including the World Socialist Web Site (WSWS) and the Railroad Workers Rank-and-File Committee (RWRFC), have denounced the SMART-TD’s actions as a betrayal of the workers they represent. They argue that the union, by accepting the premise of inevitable job cuts due to automation, is echoing management’s talking points rather than fighting for its members. The WSWS and RWRFC advocate for a united front against all Class I carriers to protect jobs and working conditions, in stark contrast to the union’s strategy of negotiating individual contracts with each company, a tactic seen as an attempt to divide and conquer the workforce.
Adding fuel to the fire, the union has resorted to ad hominem attacks, labeling critics as "outsiders" and "bad faith actors" while failing to address the substantive criticisms leveled against the agreement. This tactic, along with the union’s uncritical acceptance of the National Mediation Board’s position – a board dominated by Trump appointees – reveals a disturbing alignment between union leadership, management, and the government. The board’s assertion that workers’ rejection of contracts is "corrosive to labor relations" suggests a desire to curtail workers’ democratic rights and bypass their ability to vote on crucial agreements.
The core issue at stake is the control of new automation technologies. While the union and management present these technologies as inevitably leading to job cuts, critics argue that under public ownership and democratic control, these same technologies could be utilized to improve working conditions, shorten the workweek with no loss of pay, and enhance safety. The current trajectory, driven by the pursuit of profit maximization by private equity firms, not only threatens the livelihoods of railroad workers but also endangers public safety, as evidenced by recent disasters like the East Palestine derailment.
The SMART-TD’s push for this job-cutting agreement comes on the heels of the contentious 2022 contract negotiations, where Congress ultimately imposed a contract on workers after the union bureaucracy suppressed strike action. This history of betrayal has further fueled the rank-and-file’s distrust of the union leadership. The RWRFC is calling for the formation of rank-and-file committees in every workplace to wrest control from the union bureaucracy and build a broader movement across industries to defend workers’ rights. They argue that a national rail strike, far from being a threat to the economy, could inspire a wider working-class movement to challenge corporate power and fight for a more just and equitable society. The growing dissent within the railroad industry is a microcosm of a larger struggle playing out across various sectors, as workers increasingly challenge the status quo and demand a greater say in their working lives.
