Experts Caution Against Legal Measures Targeting Fake News, Emphasizing Freedom of Expression Concerns
Manila – Prominent academics specializing in media communications and journalism voiced concerns on Tuesday, cautioning against the potential misuse of legislation designed to combat fake news. During a joint congressional inquiry into the proliferation of disinformation, the experts warned that such laws could be arbitrarily employed to silence critics and stifle freedom of expression, potentially causing more harm than good. They emphasized the importance of carefully balancing the fight against fake news with the protection of fundamental rights, suggesting alternative approaches focused on media literacy and holding the true masterminds of disinformation accountable.
Professor Jonathan Ong, a global digital media expert at the University of Massachusetts, highlighted the dangers of top-down government regulation of social media content. He cited research from neighboring countries and warnings from international human rights organizations regarding the weaponization of anti-fake news laws against activists, journalists, and political opponents. Prof. Ong argued that such laws are often applied inconsistently and arbitrarily, serving as a tool for incumbent politicians to suppress dissent rather than address the core issue of disinformation. He advocated for civil society-led initiatives to combat falsehoods, stressing the need to support journalists, newsrooms, human rights agencies, and independent research centers in fostering a robust technology and democracy landscape within the country.
Professor Rachel Khan echoed these concerns, citing the Anti-Fake News Act of Malaysia and Singapore’s Protection from Online Falsehood and Online and Manipulation Act as examples of legislation that obstruct civil liberties and media freedom. She criticized the ambiguity of these laws’ definitions of disinformation, noting that even legitimate reporting on issues like corruption and public grievances could be wrongly categorized as false information. Prof. Khan stressed the vital importance of safeguarding freedom of expression and the press, urging legislators to prioritize these fundamental rights in any effort to address fake news.
While acknowledging the need to combat disinformation, Prof. Khan suggested drawing inspiration from Singapore’s focus on media and information literacy. She proposed a multi-stakeholder approach involving government agencies, technology companies, civil society organizations, and academia to develop and implement comprehensive public education strategies. Prof. Khan underscored the inadequacy of the current media literacy courses offered in Grades 11 and 12, advocating for the integration of media literacy education as early as Grade 1, mirroring successful models implemented in Finland and Taiwan. This early intervention, she argued, is crucial given the increasing importance of media literacy in the digital age.
Prof. Ong detailed four distinct types of anti-falsehood legislation commonly employed globally. These include laws criminalizing the spread of fake news, with penalties ranging from imprisonment for individuals and media organizations to sanctions against social media companies for failing to remove illegal content. Other approaches involve financial penalties targeting individuals, companies, or platforms; mandatory content corrections or removals; and administrative requirements such as transparency measures, media licensing regimes, and data localization practices. He emphasized the risks associated with top-down regulation, including the potential for local overregulation, empowerment of authoritarian regulators, and incentivizing social media platforms to comply with illegitimate government requests for content removal or censorship.
To avoid these pitfalls, Prof. Ong proposed alternative legislative actions, suggesting mandates for big tech companies to implement content corrections or participate in transparency mechanisms with independent researchers. He reiterated the importance of a civil society-driven approach to combatting fake news, emphasizing local context and expertise over simply replicating methodologies from other countries. This approach, he suggested, would better address the nuanced challenges posed by disinformation while preserving fundamental freedoms.
Prof. Khan further highlighted the need to hold accountable the masterminds behind disinformation campaigns, arguing that focusing on individual trolls is ineffective. She stressed the importance of identifying and penalizing those who fund and orchestrate these operations, recognizing that addressing the roots of the problem is essential for effectively combating the spread of fake news. This, she posited, would be a more impactful strategy than pursuing individual actors engaged in spreading disinformation.
