Elon Musk Amplifies Baseless Claim About UK Grooming Gangs, Sparking Online Furor
A baseless claim alleging a 2008 Home Office memo instructed police to ignore child grooming cases due to victims’ "informed choice" has resurfaced and gained significant traction online, fueled by amplification from Elon Musk on his social media platform X (formerly Twitter). The claim targets former Labour Prime Minister Gordon Brown, accusing him of complicity in covering up child sexual exploitation. However, an investigation by BBC Verify has debunked the existence of any such memo, exposing the claim as a fabrication.
The false narrative stems from a 2018 BBC radio interview with Nazir Afzal, the former chief Crown prosecutor for north-west England. Mr. Afzal asserted the existence of a Home Office circular instructing police to disregard child grooming cases. However, he now admits he never personally saw such a circular and was paraphrasing interpretations he’d heard from police officers. He points to Home Office circular 017/2008, which deals with police powers under the 1989 Children’s Act, as the likely source of misinterpretation. However, the circular contains no mention of "informed choice" and focuses on assessing significant harm to a child.
BBC Verify’s extensive research into Home Office circulars from the period found no evidence to support the claim. Searches of the National Archives and the College of Policing website, repositories for such documents, yielded no results matching the alleged memo’s content. Furthermore, Freedom of Information requests to various police forces have failed to uncover any trace of the alleged communication. The Home Office itself has categorically denied issuing any such instruction, stating that there has "never been any truth" to the claim.
The claim, using phrases like “informed choice” or “lifestyle choice”, has circulated online for years but saw a dramatic resurgence recently, fueled by Mr. Musk’s amplification on X. One of his posts, viewed over 25 million times, accused Gordon Brown of "selling those little girls for votes," while sharing a post from another user echoing the unfounded memo claim. Mr. Brown has vehemently denied the allegations, labeling them a "complete fabrication." His spokesperson confirmed he had no involvement in issuing any such circular or statement.
Mr. Afzal, acknowledging the misinformation stemming from his 2018 statement, expressed regret that his words had been "lost in translation." He has been unable to provide further evidence or identify the police officers who allegedly misinterpreted the 2008 circular. Maggie Oliver, a campaigner whose video clip reiterating the claim was shared by Mr. Musk, stated she based her assertion on Mr. Afzal’s 2018 interview. Another user whose post was amplified by Mr. Musk also cited Mr. Afzal and Ms. Oliver as her sources.
While the existence of the alleged memo is demonstrably false, the controversy highlights legitimate concerns regarding institutional failures in addressing child sexual exploitation. Professor Alexis Jay, who led the independent inquiry into child abuse, emphasized the repeated instances of ignored allegations, victim-blaming, and institutional prioritization of reputation over child protection. The online furor, though sparked by a baseless claim, underscores the need for ongoing scrutiny of institutional responses to child abuse and the importance of accurate information in public discourse. The rapid spread of misinformation online, especially when amplified by influential figures, demonstrates the potential for significant damage to reputations and the erosion of public trust. This incident underscores the urgent need for responsible online engagement and rigorous fact-checking.
