Russia’s Global Footprint: A Multifaceted Strategy Beyond Opportunism
Russia’s foreign policy, particularly in the "global South," is often characterized as opportunistic, seizing upon instability and political vacuums to expand its influence. Examples include its support for ruling juntas in Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger, and its alliances with embattled leaders in Sudan and Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, Russia has cultivated relationships with isolated regimes like North Korea, Eritrea, and Equatorial Guinea. However, this focus on opportunism overlooks the Kremlin’s long-term strategic partnerships and multifaceted approach to global engagement, which extends far beyond simply reacting to immediate circumstances.
Moscow’s enduring partnerships highlight a more deliberate and strategic approach. The BRICS alliance, initially formed in 2009 and expanded in 2024 to include Egypt, Ethiopia, and Iran, exemplifies Russia’s commitment to building long-term geopolitical blocs. Furthermore, several Cold War-era relationships with countries like Algeria, Angola, and Vietnam have endured, demonstrating enduring ties that transcend ideological shifts. Russia has also nurtured substantial partnerships with nations that were not close Soviet allies, such as Mexico, Pakistan, and Venezuela, indicating a pragmatic approach to building influence across diverse geopolitical landscapes. The reactivation of partnerships with Cuba, Iraq, and Nicaragua, after a period of dormancy in the 1990s, further underscores the Kremlin’s commitment to revitalizing historical connections.
Despite the international backlash following its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia has maintained its global footprint through a proactive strategy built on three pillars: cultivating business ties, conducting covert operations, and disseminating disinformation. These interconnected activities bolster Russia’s claim to great power status and project its narrative regarding the war in Ukraine onto the global stage.
Russian Companies: Tools of Influence and Elite Capture
Russian companies, particularly in the defense and energy sectors, play a key role in advancing the Kremlin’s foreign policy agenda. Despite the relatively small size and resource-dependent nature of Russia’s economy, large state-owned and state-aligned companies like Rostec, Gazprom, Rosneft, and Rosatom operate globally, particularly in developing countries. These companies facilitate "elite capture," a strategy where Moscow uses relatively small investments to gain disproportionate influence over foreign governments by enabling local elites to enrich themselves and consolidate power. This creates dependencies and makes these governments more susceptible to Kremlin pressure, influencing their votes in international fora and securing advantageous deals for Russian companies. This mirrors China’s approach to global influence, demonstrating a convergence of tactics between these two major powers.
Although economic sanctions and global condemnation of the war in Ukraine have impacted Russian investment projects abroad, the Kremlin continues to leverage these companies for political gain. A prime example, albeit unsuccessful, was the attempt to secure a nuclear power plant deal with South Africa under President Jacob Zuma. This case highlighted the potential for corruption and the importance of robust checks and balances within recipient countries to resist such manipulative tactics.
Russian Covert Operations: A Global Network of Influence
Beyond business dealings, Russia offers intelligence and military support to partner governments, often under the guise of counterterrorism or anti-drug trafficking efforts. In return, these governments adopt pro-Russian foreign policy stances, advocate for Russia in international forums, and secure lucrative mining deals. The covert nature of these operations, often involving the GRU (Russian military intelligence) and Wagner Group mercenaries, allows Russia to maintain a degree of plausible deniability. Despite the strain on resources due to the war in Ukraine, Russian military and intelligence presence persists in several countries, demonstrating a continued commitment to these covert activities.
These covert ties also facilitate sanctions evasion and other illicit activities. Secret trade channels have been used to repatriate profits from Russian oil sales and procure goods subject to export controls. Moreover, Russia uses seemingly benign organizations, such as election monitoring groups, as fronts for intelligence gathering and electoral interference, undermining democratic processes in numerous countries across Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East.
Russian Disinformation: Shaping Narratives and Sowing Discord
Russian disinformation campaigns, disseminated through state-controlled media, troll farms, and local contractors, represent another crucial element of the Kremlin’s global strategy. These campaigns exploit societal divisions, erode trust in institutions, and bolster support for pro-Russian narratives. Examples include targeted disinformation campaigns against UN peacekeeping missions in Africa, aimed at legitimizing Russian military presence.
Russian disinformation operates on two levels: conflict generation and the propagation of strategic narratives. "Konfliktologiya," or the study of conflict generation, guides Russian disinformation efforts to exacerbate existing tensions and undermine democratic institutions. These efforts are often intertwined with broader strategic narratives that portray Russia as a victim of international conspiracies, the US as an aggressor, and the West as decadent. These narratives are adapted to resonate with local audiences, emphasizing anti-colonial sentiments in Africa and anti-Americanism in Latin America. The overarching goal is to create a favorable environment for Russian influence and justify its foreign policy actions, including the invasion of Ukraine.
Countering Russian Influence: A Global Imperative
Combating Russia’s global campaign requires a comprehensive and coordinated response. Europe must prioritize its own security by addressing Russian covert operations and disinformation campaigns within its borders. Globally, supporting independent media and civil society organizations that expose Russian disinformation and corrupt practices is essential. Furthermore, fostering genuine partnerships based on mutual respect and shared interests, as exemplified by initiatives like the EU’s Global Gateway, can provide a compelling alternative to Russia’s manipulative tactics. By combining robust countermeasures with proactive engagement, the international community can effectively challenge Russia’s malign influence and promote a more just and democratic world order.
