Meta Under Fire for Profiting from Pro-Russian Disinformation Campaign
PARIS – Meta, the parent company of Facebook, is facing intense scrutiny following revelations that it profited handsomely from a sophisticated pro-Russian disinformation network operating on its platform. A collaborative investigation by digital manipulation specialists Check First, Reset Tech, and AI Forensics has uncovered that Meta earned US$338,000 between August 2023 and November 2024 by hosting at least 8,000 sponsored content pieces linked to the "Doppelganger" operation. This network, known for its dissemination of anti-Ukraine and anti-Western narratives, targeted tens of thousands of Facebook users across France, Germany, Poland, and Italy with misleading cartoons, inflammatory messages, and other sponsored content. The report, titled "Influence by Design," details how Doppelganger exploited Meta’s advertising platform to spread its propaganda, raising serious questions about the social media giant’s commitment to combating disinformation and its adherence to international sanctions.
The Doppelganger operation, initially identified in 2022, employs a strategy of mimicking legitimate Western media outlets to lend an air of credibility to its disinformation efforts. It has expanded its reach beyond traditional social media posts to leverage paid advertising on platforms like Facebook. The campaign has even infiltrated the newer social media platform Bluesky, attracting users disillusioned with Twitter under Elon Musk’s ownership. The operation’s persistence despite sanctions imposed on two Russian companies – Social Design Agency (SDA) being one of them – widely believed to be orchestrating the content, raises significant concerns. Despite these sanctions, Meta continued to approve and distribute advertisements linked to SDA, potentially violating international sanctions frameworks. The report suggests the actual volume of disseminated content is likely far greater than reported, as the analysis was limited to information gleaned from leaked SDA documents.
Meta’s response to these allegations has been inadequate. While the company acknowledged the existence of Doppelganger in 2022, referring to it as a “coordinated influence campaign,” its subsequent actions have fallen short. Meta claims to have blocked tens of thousands of related posts and boasts about being the first tech company to uncover the campaign. However, the new report suggests these measures were insufficient to prevent the network from continuing its disinformation activities and generating substantial revenue for the platform. Critics argue that Meta’s prioritization of profit over platform integrity allowed Doppelganger to thrive, exposing millions of users to manipulative content.
The Doppelganger campaign’s tactics demonstrate a high degree of sophistication. The operation adapts its messaging to current events, exploiting genuine societal concerns and exaggerating them to sow discord and amplify anti-Western sentiment. It leverages networks of bot accounts with AI-generated profile photos and identical biographies to boost engagement and spread its messages across various platforms. On Bluesky, these profiles strategically engage with influential accounts to gain visibility and maximize their impact. This adaptability and strategic use of social media features highlights the evolving nature of disinformation campaigns and the challenges platforms face in combating them.
Despite the sophistication and persistence of Doppelganger’s efforts, its impact in terms of audience engagement appears limited. Paradoxically, the campaign’s notoriety may be contributing to its limited success. The widespread media coverage exposing Doppelganger’s tactics, coupled with reports from researchers and platforms, have effectively labeled the content as blatant Russian propaganda. This awareness may be deterring users from engaging with the content, even if they encounter it. The irony is that the very efforts to expose and denounce the campaign may be inadvertently giving it a degree of unwelcome publicity.
This incident underscores the growing challenge of disinformation operations on social media platforms. The case of Doppelganger highlights the need for increased transparency and accountability from tech giants like Meta. The platform’s profit from these campaigns raises crucial questions about its commitment to combating disinformation and the effectiveness of its content moderation policies. Moving forward, more robust mechanisms for identifying and removing malicious content are needed. Furthermore, platforms must prioritize the development of strategies that discourage the spread of disinformation while respecting freedom of speech. The ongoing battle against disinformation requires a collaborative effort between tech companies, researchers, policymakers, and users to ensure the integrity of online information.
