Pro-Duterte Vloggers Apologize for Spreading False Information in House Hearing
MANILA, Philippines – A tense House hearing saw several pro-Duterte vloggers and online personalities issue apologies after being confronted with evidence of their dissemination of false information. The hearing, convened by a House tri-committee, stemmed from concerns raised by Surigao del Norte 2nd District Representative Ace Barbers regarding online attacks by “trolls and malicious vloggers” and the spread of Chinese propaganda concerning the West Philippine Sea. This particular session, the third in the series, brought these online figures face-to-face with lawmakers after their attempts to avoid participation through a Supreme Court challenge proved unsuccessful.
The hearing focused on two prominent figures: Krizette Chu, boasting a substantial Facebook following of 250,000, and MJ Quiambao, a blogger with 67,000 Facebook followers. Chu faced questioning from House Assistant Majority Leader Jude Acidre regarding her claims of impending mass resignations within the Philippine National Police (PNP) and the Armed Forces of the Philippines following the issuance of an arrest warrant for former President Rodrigo Duterte by the International Criminal Court. These claims had already been refuted by the PNP and reiterated during the hearing by Criminal Investigation and Detection Group chief Major General Nicolas Torre III. Initially, Chu attempted to defend her post, citing it as a reflection of "impressions" circulating on social media. However, under further questioning by Manila 6th District Representative Bienvenido Abante, she conceded the inaccuracy of her initial post and committed to issuing a correction. Chu also apologized for using inflammatory language in a separate post criticizing the alleged extravagant lifestyles of congressmen’s children.
Quiambao, on the other hand, drew the ire of Representative Abante for her assertions that victims of the drug war were a fabrication. Abante pointedly referenced the presence of drug war victims at previous hearings, including their participation in prayer rallies. Quiambao attempted to justify her position by citing news reports that alluded to some families misrepresenting their deceased relatives as victims of extrajudicial killings. However, Abang Lingkod Representative Caraps Paduano challenged the validity of her claims, emphasizing the lack of supporting official documentation. Quiambao ultimately offered an apology and pledged to substantiate her claims with documented evidence in the future. She later became emotional, attributing her distress to the threat of being held in contempt and detained by the House.
The hearing underscored the growing concern surrounding the spread of misinformation online, particularly by influential figures with substantial followings. The willingness of the House to compel the attendance of these online personalities demonstrates a commitment to holding them accountable for their online activity. The apologies offered by Chu and Quiambao, while under pressure, suggest a recognition of the potential harm of disseminating unverified information. The hearing also highlighted the challenges in navigating the often blurred lines between opinion, impression, and verifiable fact in the digital age.
Beyond Chu and Quiambao, several other pro-Duterte vloggers were present at the hearing, including former Presidential press secretary turned critic Trixie Cruz-Angeles, Aeron Peña, Elizabeth Joie Cruz, Ethel Pineda Garcia, Mark Anthony Lopez, and Richard Mata. Their presence marked a significant shift from their previous refusal to attend, which had led them to challenge the constitutionality of the proceedings in the Supreme Court. This change in tactic suggests a recognition of the House’s authority and the potential consequences of continued non-compliance.
However, the absence of former National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC) officials Lorraine Badoy and Jeffrey Celis signaled a continued defiance of the House’s summons. Their ongoing refusal to participate raises questions about the extent to which the House can enforce its authority and the potential implications for future attempts to regulate online discourse. The contrasting approaches taken by the attending vloggers and the absent NTF-ELCAC officials underscore the ongoing debate surrounding the balance between freedom of speech and the need to combat the spread of disinformation.
This hearing serves as a critical juncture in the ongoing struggle against online misinformation. The focus on pro-Duterte vloggers underlines the politicized nature of online discourse and the potential for its manipulation for political ends. The apologies offered, while a step towards accountability, do not fully address the underlying issue of the proliferation of false narratives. The continued absence of some key figures also highlights the challenges in effectively regulating online spaces. Moving forward, the House’s actions will be closely watched as they navigate the complex landscape of online speech and seek to establish mechanisms for promoting accuracy and accountability.