Controversial COVID-19 Contrarian Physician Sanctioned for Misinformation
Dr. Roger Hodkinson, a pathologist who gained notoriety for his outspoken opposition to COVID-19 public health measures, has been formally reprimanded by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA) for unprofessional conduct. Hodkinson’s pronouncements, amplified through social media and embraced by anti-vaccine and anti-restriction groups, characterized the pandemic as no worse than a bad flu, dismissed the efficacy of masks and vaccines, and condemned social distancing measures as harmful. The CPSA tribunal found that Hodkinson made statements outside his area of expertise and violated the college’s code of ethics.
The sanction, considered by some as a relatively lenient measure, requires Hodkinson to complete an online course on influence and advocacy, issue a caution, and pay $5,000 towards the investigation costs. Despite the global reach of his misinformation campaign, fueled by translations into multiple languages by conspiracy theorists and amplified by figures like Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, the CPSA’s response was limited to these relatively minor penalties. This decision has prompted debate about the adequacy of regulatory bodies’ responses to medical professionals spreading misinformation, particularly given the significant public health implications during a global pandemic.
Hodkinson’s pronouncements found a receptive audience among anti-vaccine and anti-restriction groups, and he became a frequent guest on fringe media programs where his credentials were often highlighted. He even appeared on a podcast hosted by Danielle Smith, before she became premier, where they discussed "deplatformed doctors" who held contrarian views regarding COVID-19. Smith, who herself faced criticism for her views on COVID-19, expressed sympathy for medical professionals who faced consequences for expressing opinions outside the mainstream narrative. This association with a prominent political figure further elevated Hodkinson’s profile and contributed to the spread of his controversial views.
The catalyst for the CPSA’s intervention was Hodkinson’s appearance at an Edmonton city council meeting in 2020, where he vehemently denounced mask mandates and questioned the expertise of public health officials. This public display, captured on video and widely circulated on social media, became a focal point of the complaints lodged against him. The CPSA also cited other public statements made by Hodkinson in 2021, further cementing the pattern of his contentious public commentary. These pronouncements contributed to public confusion and potentially undermined trust in evidence-based public health guidance.
The contrast between Hodkinson’s previous combative social media presence and his subdued demeanor during the November hearing was notable. His prior aggressive rhetoric, including threats against medical professionals who disagreed with him, painted a picture of a man deeply entrenched in his beliefs. However, during the hearing, he appeared resigned to the outcome, accepting the joint submission on the sanction. This shift suggests a potential acknowledgment of the consequences of his actions, though he has not explicitly expressed remorse or retracted his previous statements.
The CPSA’s decision to sanction Hodkinson, while welcomed by some, has also been criticized as insufficient given the extent of his misinformation campaign. Critics argue that a more robust response was necessary to deter similar behavior in the future and to send a clear message that spreading misinformation has consequences. This case highlights the challenges faced by regulatory bodies in navigating the complexities of free speech while ensuring the integrity of the medical profession and protecting public health. The debate surrounding the appropriate response to medical professionals spreading misinformation is likely to continue, especially in light of the increasing influence of social media and the spread of disinformation online.