Four Overseas Vloggers Face Legal Action in the Philippines for Disinformation and Slander Against NBI Director
Manila, Philippines – The Department of Justice (DOJ) is currently reviewing multiple complaints filed against four overseas-based Filipino vloggers accused of disseminating disinformation and manipulating video footage of National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) Director Jaime Santiago. The vloggers allegedly misrepresented Santiago’s statements regarding potential legal action against OFW vloggers spreading false information, sparking outrage and confusion among the Filipino online community.
The NBI, through Intelligence Service agent Mikhail Sebrio, lodged the complaints, accusing Maricel Tondi, Jennifer dela Cruz, Jacinta Cayme Antasuda, and Cherry Lyn Capanas of violating several provisions of the Revised Penal Code, including the Anti-Alias Law, unlawful use of means of publication and unlawful utterances, intriguing against honor, and inciting to sedition. These charges are further linked to the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012. The complaints allege a concerted effort to manipulate a video of Director Santiago, twisting his words to create a false narrative that targeted all OFWs, not just those engaging in disinformation.
The controversy stems from an edited video clip of Director Santiago discussing potential legal action against individuals spreading disinformation online, specifically mentioning a US-based individual. While Santiago’s original statement focused on targeting those actively involved in spreading false narratives, the edited version removed crucial context, making it appear as if he was threatening all OFWs with arrest upon their return to the Philippines. This manipulated clip quickly spread across social media platforms, fueled by the actions of the accused vloggers.
According to the NBI’s investigation, Tondi, based in Saudi Arabia, is believed to be the source of the manipulated video. Dela Cruz, residing in New Zealand, allegedly shared the video on her Facebook page, which boasts over 202,000 followers, significantly amplifying its reach. Antasuda, reportedly located in the United Kingdom and possessing a verified Facebook account, is accused of lending credibility to the misleading content through her established online presence. Capanas, based in Canada, is alleged to have profited from the viral spread of the video, which garnered millions of views and thousands of shares.
The NBI emphasizes that Director Santiago’s original statement targeted only those OFWs engaged in the dissemination of false information, not the entire OFW community. The manipulated video and its subsequent dissemination, however, created widespread confusion and anxiety among OFWs, many of whom rely on social media for news and updates from the Philippines. Agent Sebrio highlighted the significant negative impact of the manipulated video, citing thousands of negative comments and reactions online, illustrating the widespread concern and anger generated by the misrepresentation of Director Santiago’s words.
The legal complaints highlight the serious consequences of manipulating information and spreading disinformation online. The charges against the four vloggers underscore the importance of responsible social media use and the potential legal repercussions for spreading false information. The NBI’s investigation and subsequent legal action serve as a warning against the misuse of online platforms to spread misinformation and incite negativity. The case is ongoing, and the DOJ will determine the appropriate course of action based on the evidence presented. The outcome of this case will likely have significant implications for online content creators and highlight the growing need for accountability in the digital sphere. The incident also underscores the vulnerability of individuals, particularly public figures, to misrepresentation and manipulation in the age of social media. The widespread sharing and amplification of the manipulated video demonstrate the rapid and potentially damaging spread of disinformation online, emphasizing the need for critical media literacy and fact-checking. The case serves as a reminder of the power of social media and the importance of responsible online behavior.