Moldovan Journalists Expose Pro-Russian Network’s Election Interference Tactics
Chisinau, Moldova – Investigative journalists Natalia Zaharescu and Măriuța Nistor, from the independent newspaper Ziarul de Gardă, have provided chilling insights into the operations of a pro-Russian network seeking to undermine Moldova’s democratic processes. In a daring three-month undercover operation, they infiltrated the network of exiled oligarch Ilan Șor, documenting the sophisticated methods employed to manipulate public opinion, buy votes, and intimidate journalists. Their findings, published in the two-part exposé “In the Service of Moscow,” which garnered them the prestigious 2025 European Press Prize, reveal the depth of Russian interference in Moldovan elections and the precarious position of journalists working to expose such machinations.
The journalists’ investigation focused on the 2024 presidential elections and the concurrent referendum on European integration, demonstrating how Șor’s network systematically mobilized supporters, disbursed funds for vote-buying, and spread disinformation to sway public opinion. Zaharescu and Nistor gained access to inner circles of the network, attending meetings, participating in protests, and even interacting with Șor-backed presidential candidates. Their findings expose a carefully orchestrated campaign of manipulation, exploiting economic vulnerabilities and nostalgic sentiments within segments of the Moldovan population. The investigation revealed that the network’s activities extend beyond election periods, with ongoing efforts to maintain influence and destabilize the country.
The journalists describe a hierarchical structure within Șor’s network, with directives and narratives originating from Moscow. While rank-and-file members are primarily motivated by financial incentives and social belonging, higher-level operatives are tasked with disseminating pre-packaged propaganda and implementing strategic plans. This sophisticated organization allows for the targeted manipulation of specific demographics, particularly elderly citizens susceptible to pro-Russian rhetoric and economic hardship. The network exploits these vulnerabilities, offering financial assistance, social interaction, and a sense of purpose to individuals often overlooked by mainstream society.
The investigation highlights the significant risks faced by journalists in Moldova, who are often subjected to online harassment, verbal attacks, and even physical threats. Zaharescu and Nistor recount instances of being targeted by pro-Șor supporters, facing unfounded accusations, and enduring smear campaigns aimed at discrediting their work. They also point to the challenges of accessing information, with institutions often reluctant to provide transparency and politicians resorting to personal attacks rather than addressing critical questions. Despite these pressures, they remain resolute in their commitment to investigative journalism and holding power accountable.
Beyond the immediate threat of election interference, the investigation exposes deeper societal issues contributing to the network’s success. Economic inequality and the failure of successive governments to address the needs of vulnerable populations create fertile ground for manipulation. Zaharescu and Nistor argue that the government’s response to the protests, focusing on punitive measures rather than addressing underlying economic grievances, has further marginalized those susceptible to Șor’s influence. They also highlight the government’s own complicity in creating an environment conducive to Russian interference, citing past corruption scandals and the rise of pro-Moscow politicians.
The journalists remain vigilant, continuing to monitor the activities of pro-Russian groups in Moldova. They express concern about the continued operation of these networks and the potential for further interference in upcoming parliamentary elections. Their work serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of democratic institutions and the crucial role of investigative journalism in safeguarding press freedom and holding those in power to account. Their experiences underscore the challenges faced by journalists working in environments where disinformation, intimidation, and economic manipulation are used to undermine democratic processes. The ongoing struggle for press freedom and fair elections in Moldova remains a critical battleground in the broader geopolitical context of Russian influence in the region.
