Changchun Voucher Incident: Unpaid Wages, Not Separate Currency
Social media posts falsely claimed that the Chinese city of Changchun was printing its own currency. These posts, often originating from accounts known for anti-China sentiments, misrepresented vouchers issued by a real estate company as a new form of local currency. The vouchers, intended for internal use within the company’s ecosystem, were mistakenly interpreted as a sign of Changchun’s economic independence.
The controversy began with a post on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (RedNote). The post, now deleted, displayed a stack of 50-yuan vouchers and jokingly suggested that Changchun had the authority to print its own money. This sparked a wave of misinformation, rapidly spreading across other platforms like Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), and Douyin (China’s TikTok). Comments ranged from declarations of Changchun’s independence to sarcastic predictions about future rationing.
However, investigations revealed a different story. The vouchers were not a new currency but a substitute for unpaid wages. Reputable news outlets, including Jimu News, reported that the Dazhong Zhuoyue Holdings Group, a Changchun-based real estate developer, had issued these vouchers to employees in lieu of cash salaries. The vouchers, bearing the names of the company’s subsidiaries, could be used to purchase goods and services within their affiliated shopping malls.
This practice came to light amidst widespread protests by workers in several Chinese provinces demanding unpaid wages in the lead-up to the Lunar New Year celebrations. China’s Supreme People’s Court intervened, ordering lower courts to prioritize these cases and penalize defaulting companies. The economic fallout from the Covid-19 pandemic exacerbated the situation, with reduced domestic spending and indebted local governments contributing to the financial strain.
The Dazhong Zhuoyue Holdings Group’s actions, though not illegal in themselves, raised concerns about employee rights and financial stability. The company issued a notice explaining the voucher system, stating its purpose was to facilitate internal transactions and support its businesses. However, employee testimonies revealed a sense of desperation and frustration. Anonymous workers quoted in media reports expressed their dismay at receiving vouchers instead of their hard-earned wages, highlighting the financial hardship they faced.
The Changchun local government launched an investigation into the voucher system following employee complaints. While the vouchers were not an official currency, their use as a substitute for wages exposed underlying economic challenges and labor disputes. It also underscored the importance of accurate reporting and verifying information before sharing it on social media, particularly when sensitive geopolitical dynamics are involved. The incident highlights the potential for misinformation to spread quickly and distort the narrative surrounding complex situations.
The Chinese currency remains the yuan (renminbi), issued solely by the People’s Bank of China (PBoC). The PBoC website contains images of official legal tender, none of which resemble the vouchers issued by the Dazhong Zhuoyue Holdings Group. This further reinforces the fact that the vouchers were not an attempt to establish a separate currency, but rather a controversial response to financial difficulties within a private company. The incident underscores the challenges faced by some businesses in post-pandemic China and the resulting impact on workers’ rights. It also serves as a reminder of the importance of critical thinking and media literacy in the age of rampant misinformation.
