Philippine House Panel Explores Mandating Congressional Franchises for Social Media Platforms to Combat Disinformation
MANILA, Philippines – In a move aimed at curbing the rampant spread of disinformation online, a tri-committee of the Philippine House of Representatives is contemplating requiring social media platforms to obtain a congressional franchise before operating within the country. This proposal emerged during the panel’s final hearing under the 19th Congress, highlighting growing concerns about the unchecked power wielded by these platforms and their impact on the dissemination of false information. The tri-committee, comprised of the House committees on public information, public order and safety, and information and communication technology, grappled with the challenges of regulating online content while safeguarding free speech.
The Philippines currently lacks a comprehensive legal framework for regulating social media platforms, relying primarily on self-policing by the companies themselves. This laissez-faire approach has raised concerns, especially in light of platforms’ reluctance to remove demonstrably false content. The proposal to require congressional franchises represents a significant shift towards greater government oversight and accountability for these powerful entities. However, the move is likely to face strong opposition from free speech advocates who fear such measures could be misused to stifle legitimate dissent and criticism. Balancing the need to combat disinformation with the protection of fundamental freedoms poses a complex challenge for lawmakers.
Presidential Communications Office (PCO) Secretary Jay Ruiz sparked the debate during the hearing, advocating for stricter state regulation of social media companies. Ruiz cited an instance where Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, refused to take down a fabricated memo falsely attributed to the Office of the Executive Secretary, despite its debunking by official government channels. He argued that relying on platforms’ self-regulation and community standards is insufficient, particularly when these platforms are not based in the Philippines, do not pay local taxes, and yet profit significantly from the Philippine market.
This sentiment was echoed by Surigao del Sur Rep. Johnny Pimentel, who emphasized that despite requests for self-regulation, platforms like Meta, with a substantial user base in the Philippines, remain unresponsive. Pimentel contended that if self-regulation proves ineffective, government intervention becomes necessary. Bataan Rep. Geraldine Roman, while supporting the need for stricter rules and regulations, also stressed the importance of not imposing state regulation on individual content creators. She proposed requiring social media companies to establish legal entities within the Philippines, maintain verifiable user registries, and adhere to standards set by a proposed Digital Media Standards Coalition (DMSC). This coalition would comprise news organizations, advertisers, academics, and content creators, ensuring a balanced and representative approach to content regulation.
Information and Communications Technology Secretary Henry Aguda supported the call for regulation, noting that social media platforms, despite their immense wealth and influence, operate without the same oversight applied to traditional broadcasters or film and television content. He cited the Department of Information and Communications Technology’s (DICT) ongoing dialogue with major platforms, including Google, TikTok, and Kumu, highlighting their commitments to cooperate with government directives on disinformation. Aguda also revealed Meta’s pledge to implement a "demotion mechanism" for content flagged as fake news, reducing its visibility without outright removal. However, he emphasized the DICT’s preference for more robust self-regulation by the platforms.
Furthermore, the DICT is currently testing a locally developed AI-powered system for detecting fake news and online scams, which could potentially be offered to social media platforms. This technological approach represents a proactive step toward developing effective tools for combating disinformation. The ongoing discussions and proposed measures signal a growing recognition of the need to address the spread of disinformation on social media platforms and ensure greater accountability for their role in shaping public discourse. The debate is likely to continue as lawmakers grapple with the complexities of regulating online content while upholding fundamental freedoms and promoting a healthy online environment.
